Canada legalized same-sex marriage under Prime Minister Paul Martin, a Catholic who said that he was personally opposed to it based on his faith, but said that his job was not to enact his personal beliefs but to work with public opinion. There can be a distinction between a candidate's personal views and what they acknowledge to be their political obligations. Strict purity tests just doesn't result in intelligent and conscientious candidates. The anger from the left end of American politics risks producing the same kind of bozo candidates that the far right does. That's not advocating for centrism, but realizing that dogmatism isn't healthy in a pluralist society and/or system.Flex wrote: ↑31 Jul 2017, 1:07pm
Honestly, there is actually a case to be made for supporting pro-life Dems occasionally. It's a Harry Reid situation: he was technically pro-life but the party position was so firm he consistently voted the pro-choice positions most/all of the time anyways. Poaching a few seats in red states with pro-life dems probably does more to protect female autonomy than jettisoning those seats to republicans. But there's, what, a few of these seats AT MOST in congress? Where the area is culturally conservative but economically liberal enough that a conservadem could win? That just doesn't seem to happen much anymore. Still, you could fund those folks on a case-by-case basis. but just say "the democratic party is the pro-choice party. the end" without jettisoning the commitment to the position at the highest levels. I mean, jesus christ.
The Future of the Democratic Party
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116615
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35956
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
Well, I think the reality is that Dem establishment does have purity tests it runs, it's just all on disallowing left economic positions. They obviously don't do purity tests on social issues. It's ironic that the socialist left gets lambasted by social progressives for being insufficiently woke on this stuff when it's the HillaryDems who sell out on these things every time.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jul 2017, 1:30pmCanada legalized same-sex marriage under Prime Minister Paul Martin, a Catholic who said that he was personally opposed to it based on his faith, but said that his job was not to enact his personal beliefs but to work with public opinion. There can be a distinction between a candidate's personal views and what they acknowledge to be their political obligations. Strict purity tests just doesn't result in intelligent and conscientious candidates. The anger from the left end of American politics risks producing the same kind of bozo candidates that the far right does. That's not advocating for centrism, but realizing that dogmatism isn't healthy in a pluralist society and/or system.
The party - its platform, its non-elected leadership - should be consistent and unwavering on these issues in terms of what the party will stand for for its constituents and what it expects from its caucus. Which is why this "announcement" is deserving of scorn. Again, that doesn't rule out tactically supporting more conservative Dems in strategic areas, but it keeps the institution as a whole committed and less likely to bend on critical human rights issues. That's how to thread the needle between staying committed to just causes and not forcing purity tests where it doesn't make sense, imho.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116615
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
And that's a problem that the Democrats are so dogmatic on economic policy, the ugly result of Bill Clinton's acceptance of Reagan. Of course any party is going to have basic positions on any number of issues, but it's much healthier for internal debate for a variety of views within those positions. It's clear how lethal it's been to the Republicans, especially as they keep moving the line of True Conservative farther and farther to the right. Democratic leadership is stuck in a mindset of keeping open its right flank while being dogmatic on its left. There's an irony that even as the Republicans are doing all they can to limit voting in structural ways, the Democrats are doing the same by limiting admission to their club.Flex wrote: ↑31 Jul 2017, 1:45pmWell, I think the reality is that Dem establishment does have purity tests it runs, it's just all on disallowing left economic positions. They obviously don't do purity tests on social issues. It's ironic that the socialist left gets lambasted by social progressives for being insufficiently woke on this stuff when it's the HillaryDems who sell out on these things every time.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑31 Jul 2017, 1:30pmCanada legalized same-sex marriage under Prime Minister Paul Martin, a Catholic who said that he was personally opposed to it based on his faith, but said that his job was not to enact his personal beliefs but to work with public opinion. There can be a distinction between a candidate's personal views and what they acknowledge to be their political obligations. Strict purity tests just doesn't result in intelligent and conscientious candidates. The anger from the left end of American politics risks producing the same kind of bozo candidates that the far right does. That's not advocating for centrism, but realizing that dogmatism isn't healthy in a pluralist society and/or system.
The party - its platform, its non-elected leadership - should be consistent and unwavering on these issues in terms of what the party will stand for for its constituents and what it expects from its caucus. Which is why this "announcement" is deserving of scorn. Again, that doesn't rule out tactically supporting more conservative Dems in strategic areas, but it keeps the institution as a whole committed and less likely to bend on critical human rights issues. That's how to thread the needle between staying committed to just causes and not forcing purity tests where it doesn't make sense, imho.
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
Was this pisted? Seems like the donors want to pull this crap again.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... r-hamptons
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... r-hamptons
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116615
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
Just do away with the primaries and caucuses then. This is just the old boss system seeking to get around rank and file input.eumaas wrote: ↑02 Aug 2017, 12:43pmWas this pisted? Seems like the donors want to pull this crap again.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... r-hamptons
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116615
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
Thomas Frank on A Better Deal: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... r-optimism
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
I've been skeptical of this russia shit since the start
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new ... -dnc-hack/
This is a weird article, though. Poorly written for one. Any thoughts?
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new ... -dnc-hack/
This is a weird article, though. Poorly written for one. Any thoughts?
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116615
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
Centrist think tank recommends centrism. Film at eleven.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/0 ... rty-242308
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/0 ... rty-242308
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116615
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
My god but she's cynical and duplicitous to be peddling such bullshit. If she'd won, it would have been understood it was because the Republicans nominated one of the most toxic candidates of all time. If anything, her win would have been tainted, not proof of perfection, because she hadn't beaten a serious opponent. What a loathsome wannabe she is.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... s-if-i-won
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... s-if-i-won
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
Shes trying to exonerate herself and shift the blame.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑12 Sep 2017, 8:15pmMy god but she's cynical and duplicitous to be peddling such bullshit. If she'd won, it would have been understood it was because the Republicans nominated one of the most toxic candidates of all time. If anything, her win would have been tainted, not proof of perfection, because she hadn't beaten a serious opponent. What a loathsome wannabe she is.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... s-if-i-won
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116615
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
There was never any doubt. As long as there's a denial or lie handy, a Clinton will never resort to honesty.revbob wrote: ↑13 Sep 2017, 12:47pmShes trying to exonerate herself and shift the blame.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑12 Sep 2017, 8:15pmMy god but she's cynical and duplicitous to be peddling such bullshit. If she'd won, it would have been understood it was because the Republicans nominated one of the most toxic candidates of all time. If anything, her win would have been tainted, not proof of perfection, because she hadn't beaten a serious opponent. What a loathsome wannabe she is.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... s-if-i-won
Tom Frank's review of her account: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ar-message
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116615
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... run-report
Yes, the future must be an elderly pro-military centrist because all possibilities must be wretched.
Yes, the future must be an elderly pro-military centrist because all possibilities must be wretched.
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35956
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
hopefully he'll net someone some death pool points ahead of 2020Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑10 Nov 2017, 12:14pmYes, the future must be an elderly pro-military centrist because all possibilities must be wretched.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35956
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
so long, al.
Interesting to see some establishment electeds try to deflect, but the rank and file seems pretty ready to immediately cut bait. Just shows how totally connected to their base and for sure sincere dems establishment is with all the #believewomen stuff.
Interesting to see some establishment electeds try to deflect, but the rank and file seems pretty ready to immediately cut bait. Just shows how totally connected to their base and for sure sincere dems establishment is with all the #believewomen stuff.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Re: The Future of the Democratic Party
Yeah...the dems have, for the most part, been quick to call any of their guys out. Except for Clinton. Franken needs to resign.
Got a Rake? Sure!
IMCT: Inane Middle-Class Twats - Dr. M
" *sigh* it's right when they throw the penis pump out the window." -Hoy
IMCT: Inane Middle-Class Twats - Dr. M
" *sigh* it's right when they throw the penis pump out the window." -Hoy