Clash voices
- Heston
- God of Thunder...and Rock 'n Roll
- Posts: 38371
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 4:07pm
- Location: North of Watford Junction
Clash voices
I'm just listening to Ivan Meets GI Joe from Marky's remastered Mogador show and Topper actually has a very good voice when you strip away that vocoder effect they used on Sandinista. I'd even go as far as to say he was technically the best singer in the Clash. I love Joe and Mick's voices but they are both pretty unconventional in that sense, they just have that passion and believability. It's strange how a lot of supposedly technically superior bands cover the Clash but end up lacking vocally.
Paul's singing voice is kinda strange and does anyone else ever wonder if Guns of Brixton would have been even better if Joe had sang it? In fact give him Red Angel Dragnet as well.
The Vince and Nick Experience was pretty horrific vocally.
Paul's singing voice is kinda strange and does anyone else ever wonder if Guns of Brixton would have been even better if Joe had sang it? In fact give him Red Angel Dragnet as well.
The Vince and Nick Experience was pretty horrific vocally.
There's a tiny, tiny hopeful part of me that says you guys are running a Kaufmanesque long con on the board
-
Low Down Low
- Unknown Immortal
- Posts: 5039
- Joined: 21 Aug 2014, 9:08am
Re: Clash voices
Cant imagine GOB without Paul singing, its just hotwired into my brain after so many years and by the fact I've never heard a passably decent cover. As for Topper, I imagine he could hold a tune alright, but dont recall him doing any vocals on the solo album so maybe he didn't think so himself.
I love Van Morrison and rate him as the best technical singer in the business, but otherwise most of the singers I like are not what would be regarded as technically gifted: Strummer, Leonard Cohen, Ry Cooder, Nick Cave. You could also lump Dylan, Tom Waits and I'm sure a host of others in that category.
I love Van Morrison and rate him as the best technical singer in the business, but otherwise most of the singers I like are not what would be regarded as technically gifted: Strummer, Leonard Cohen, Ry Cooder, Nick Cave. You could also lump Dylan, Tom Waits and I'm sure a host of others in that category.
-
Silent Majority
- Singer-Songwriter Nancy
- Posts: 18757
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 8:28pm
- Location: South Londoner in the Midlands.
Re: Clash voices
Strummer's voice is expressive and more musical than it seems at first glance. Because he sounds like the guy next door, you're tricked into missing that he's hiting notes and finding little melodic flourishes that you wouldn't expect; even in the first album there's a surprising range. I can hear the influence - and this isn't as insane as it sounds - of the smoothness of a Chuck Berry.
If I've got a criticism of Mick's singing, it's that he lacks confidence. He's got power there that he seems embarrassed to reach for. I can hear his control over it slide away at some points. i wonder if the root of that lies in having to play complicated guitar at the same time. No matter what, it's really ingratiating. Just a friendly, warm spot to spend time with. Listening to Mick sing is like hanging out with your best mate. And he's got a fabulous connection to all the emotions in the spectrum. From Lost in the Supermarket to Hate & War.
I wouldn't want anyone but Paul on Guns of Brixton. It's almost hip hop.
If I've got a criticism of Mick's singing, it's that he lacks confidence. He's got power there that he seems embarrassed to reach for. I can hear his control over it slide away at some points. i wonder if the root of that lies in having to play complicated guitar at the same time. No matter what, it's really ingratiating. Just a friendly, warm spot to spend time with. Listening to Mick sing is like hanging out with your best mate. And he's got a fabulous connection to all the emotions in the spectrum. From Lost in the Supermarket to Hate & War.
I wouldn't want anyone but Paul on Guns of Brixton. It's almost hip hop.
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116721
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Clash voices
Because GoB works so well with Paul's, um, unconventional style, I wouldn't want to change it, but now that you've raised the idea, I don't doubt that Joe would have done it justice. The guy was a rare, truly natural performer.
"Ain't no party like an S Club party!'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Clash voices
He's awfully pitchy in some shows, and really off key sometimes. It could be the distraction of having to play guitar at the same time, but maybe he knows he's not got the best pitch and it psyches him out? I've often wondered this. He's good in the studio, but after how many takes?Silent Majority wrote: ↑01 Nov 2017, 8:05pmIf I've got a criticism of Mick's singing, it's that he lacks confidence. He's got power there that he seems embarrassed to reach for. I can hear his control over it slide away at some points. i wonder if the root of that lies in having to play complicated guitar at the same time. No matter what, it's really ingratiating. Just a friendly, warm spot to spend time with. Listening to Mick sing is like hanging out with your best mate. And he's got a fabulous connection to all the emotions in the spectrum. From Lost in the Supermarket to Hate & War.
"Suck our Earth dick, Martians!" —Doc
- Heston
- God of Thunder...and Rock 'n Roll
- Posts: 38371
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 4:07pm
- Location: North of Watford Junction
Re: Clash voices
Yeah, I think Paul does a pretty good job on it, maybe I've been a bit harsh on him. Joe could also do a pretty menacing vocal too though, a solo live version at some point may have been nice. I don't think RAD or Crooked Beat do Paul many favours, he should have maybe retired the mike after GoB.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑01 Nov 2017, 8:11pmBecause GoB works so well with Paul's, um, unconventional style, I wouldn't want to change it, but now that you've raised the idea, I don't doubt that Joe would have done it justice. The guy was a rare, truly natural performer.
There's a tiny, tiny hopeful part of me that says you guys are running a Kaufmanesque long con on the board
-
Silent Majority
- Singer-Songwriter Nancy
- Posts: 18757
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 8:28pm
- Location: South Londoner in the Midlands.
Re: Clash voices
He's way out of tune at the start of Something About England, but it doesn't hurt the song.Kory wrote: ↑01 Nov 2017, 8:19pmHe's awfully pitchy in some shows, and really off key sometimes. It could be the distraction of having to play guitar at the same time, but maybe he knows he's not got the best pitch and it psyches him out? I've often wondered this. He's good in the studio, but after how many takes?Silent Majority wrote: ↑01 Nov 2017, 8:05pmIf I've got a criticism of Mick's singing, it's that he lacks confidence. He's got power there that he seems embarrassed to reach for. I can hear his control over it slide away at some points. i wonder if the root of that lies in having to play complicated guitar at the same time. No matter what, it's really ingratiating. Just a friendly, warm spot to spend time with. Listening to Mick sing is like hanging out with your best mate. And he's got a fabulous connection to all the emotions in the spectrum. From Lost in the Supermarket to Hate & War.
- Heston
- God of Thunder...and Rock 'n Roll
- Posts: 38371
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 4:07pm
- Location: North of Watford Junction
Re: Clash voices
Now I just love Mick's voice on that song though I've heard criticism of it in the past. His voice just suits the pomposity of the intro.Silent Majority wrote: ↑01 Nov 2017, 8:22pmHe's way out of tune at the start of Something About England, but it doesn't hurt the song.Kory wrote: ↑01 Nov 2017, 8:19pmHe's awfully pitchy in some shows, and really off key sometimes. It could be the distraction of having to play guitar at the same time, but maybe he knows he's not got the best pitch and it psyches him out? I've often wondered this. He's good in the studio, but after how many takes?Silent Majority wrote: ↑01 Nov 2017, 8:05pmIf I've got a criticism of Mick's singing, it's that he lacks confidence. He's got power there that he seems embarrassed to reach for. I can hear his control over it slide away at some points. i wonder if the root of that lies in having to play complicated guitar at the same time. No matter what, it's really ingratiating. Just a friendly, warm spot to spend time with. Listening to Mick sing is like hanging out with your best mate. And he's got a fabulous connection to all the emotions in the spectrum. From Lost in the Supermarket to Hate & War.
There's a tiny, tiny hopeful part of me that says you guys are running a Kaufmanesque long con on the board
- Rat Patrol
- Unknown Immortal
- Posts: 15431
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 9:23pm
- Location: A flat burning junkheap for twenty square miles
Re: Clash voices
Paul wrote GoB lock, stock. That just seems...wrong at a fundamental level...to deprive him of the vocal. It works (studio) because of his voice. The only thing I object to is it being song-fucking-six in every live setlist for eternity, because he just could not hold the tune. And I don't buy that playing guitar was what ruined it, because he only scratched at the telecaster when Mick was soloing.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑01 Nov 2017, 8:11pmBecause GoB works so well with Paul's, um, unconventional style, I wouldn't want to change it, but now that you've raised the idea, I don't doubt that Joe would have done it justice. The guy was a rare, truly natural performer.
RAD is the real warcrime, because that was a full-on Joe-penned vocal that was given to him so they could hit 3 consecutive albums of Paul lead vox "quota".
- Rat Patrol
- Unknown Immortal
- Posts: 15431
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 9:23pm
- Location: A flat burning junkheap for twenty square miles
Re: Clash voices
He had no trouble playing guitar and singing with power consistently live. If anything, doing solo vocal takes in the studio WITHOUT playing guitar may have freaked him out a little bit, and led to his paranoia about double-tracking all his album vox in soft-focus. Joe couldn't handle that either, and either had to have an unplugged guitar to hack at while doing his vocal takes or otherwise keep his hands busy. Sometimes singing+playing works the opposite way when you're so used to working songs up in full-band rehearsals and then have to break them apart multi-track by multi-track. What albums were fraught with low confidence in the studio?...GEER (excepting late-'77 songs Tommy and LGIT) which required sitting around and writing fresh, and RP/CR where they stagnated on the double-album portion. s/t was all from the live set, the inter-album singles and CoL were all short-notice studio bookings of stuff worked up whole, LC was culled from the sing-into-the-can Vanilla Tapes, S! was a bunch of spontaneously-invented first takes with tape running, and the stronger half of CR was worked up in tour rehearsals. So even the stuff that morphed into purely studio arrangements started out being sketched with the primary singers working out their vocal deliveries while playing. If that's what you're so used to, it's going to be disorienting to do it any other way.Silent Majority wrote: ↑01 Nov 2017, 8:05pmIf I've got a criticism of Mick's singing, it's that he lacks confidence. He's got power there that he seems embarrassed to reach for. I can hear his control over it slide away at some points. i wonder if the root of that lies in having to play complicated guitar at the same time. No matter what, it's really ingratiating. Just a friendly, warm spot to spend time with. Listening to Mick sing is like hanging out with your best mate. And he's got a fabulous connection to all the emotions in the spectrum. From Lost in the Supermarket to Hate & War.
Now, TRAC...he must've taken some singing lessons before doing those demos because he demonstrates a quantum leap confidence-wise in power, range, and emotional versatility on those songs. Never ever sounded better in his whole life. Which makes it all the more baffling that he turned around months later and cockneyed it up for B.A.D. to sound intentionally off-key on the first 3 albums. Yeah, Don and Greg kind of sound like a muppet chorus on backing...but that doesn't mean you need to chuck aside contrast for parity's sake. Some of the live recordings where he sings it straight-ahead beat the pants of the phlegmmier 'intentional' takes.
-
Silent Majority
- Singer-Songwriter Nancy
- Posts: 18757
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 8:28pm
- Location: South Londoner in the Midlands.
Re: Clash voices
You can actually hear his confidence on the night grow as this song progresses. From some shaky pitch at the start, he gains control over his instrument. It's very good.Rat Patrol wrote: ↑02 Nov 2017, 6:25amHe had no trouble playing guitar and singing with power consistently live. If anything, doing solo vocal takes in the studio WITHOUT playing guitar may have freaked him out a little bit, and led to his paranoia about double-tracking all his album vox in soft-focus. Joe couldn't handle that either, and either had to have an unplugged guitar to hack at while doing his vocal takes or otherwise keep his hands busy. Sometimes singing+playing works the opposite way when you're so used to working songs up in full-band rehearsals and then have to break them apart multi-track by multi-track. What albums were fraught with low confidence in the studio?...GEER (excepting late-'77 songs Tommy and LGIT) which required sitting around and writing fresh, and RP/CR where they stagnated on the double-album portion. s/t was all from the live set, the inter-album singles and CoL were all short-notice studio bookings of stuff worked up whole, LC was culled from the sing-into-the-can Vanilla Tapes, S! was a bunch of spontaneously-invented first takes with tape running, and the stronger half of CR was worked up in tour rehearsals. So even the stuff that morphed into purely studio arrangements started out being sketched with the primary singers working out their vocal deliveries while playing. If that's what you're so used to, it's going to be disorienting to do it any other way.Silent Majority wrote: ↑01 Nov 2017, 8:05pmIf I've got a criticism of Mick's singing, it's that he lacks confidence. He's got power there that he seems embarrassed to reach for. I can hear his control over it slide away at some points. i wonder if the root of that lies in having to play complicated guitar at the same time. No matter what, it's really ingratiating. Just a friendly, warm spot to spend time with. Listening to Mick sing is like hanging out with your best mate. And he's got a fabulous connection to all the emotions in the spectrum. From Lost in the Supermarket to Hate & War.
Now, TRAC...he must've taken some singing lessons before doing those demos because he demonstrates a quantum leap confidence-wise in power, range, and emotional versatility on those songs. Never ever sounded better in his whole life. Which makes it all the more baffling that he turned around months later and cockneyed it up for B.A.D. to sound intentionally off-key on the first 3 albums. Yeah, Don and Greg kind of sound like a muppet chorus on backing...but that doesn't mean you need to chuck aside contrast for parity's sake. Some of the live recordings where he sings it straight-ahead beat the pants of the phlegmmier 'intentional' takes.
- WestwayKid
- Unknown Immortal
- Posts: 6788
- Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 8:22am
- Location: Mill-e-wah-que
Re: Clash voices
I definitely agree with your take on Mick. I've always thought he sounds like he lacks confidence in his own voice. It's almost like he thinks about it too much and then overthinks it. Anything is better when we just do it without thinking about it. I play baseball, for instance. I'm not bad at it - but I'll go through spells where I think about my hitting too much and then I don't swing the bat as well as I can. I get self conscious and I press. If I just swing away and let my body do what it does - I'm fine. I've always liked Mick's voice. I think he comes across as honest and emotive. Joe clearly had the best voice - but I've always liked how Mick's voice balanced Joe's. In regards to Paul...GoB - I just can't think of anyone else doing it. RAD works because while Paul might take the lead - you also have Kosmo's Taxi Driver spoken word bits and then Mick and Joe clearly in the background. That is actually a pretty fascinating song from a vocal standpoint when you think about it.Silent Majority wrote: ↑01 Nov 2017, 8:05pmStrummer's voice is expressive and more musical than it seems at first glance. Because he sounds like the guy next door, you're tricked into missing that he's hiting notes and finding little melodic flourishes that you wouldn't expect; even in the first album there's a surprising range. I can hear the influence - and this isn't as insane as it sounds - of the smoothness of a Chuck Berry.
If I've got a criticism of Mick's singing, it's that he lacks confidence. He's got power there that he seems embarrassed to reach for. I can hear his control over it slide away at some points. i wonder if the root of that lies in having to play complicated guitar at the same time. No matter what, it's really ingratiating. Just a friendly, warm spot to spend time with. Listening to Mick sing is like hanging out with your best mate. And he's got a fabulous connection to all the emotions in the spectrum. From Lost in the Supermarket to Hate & War.
I wouldn't want anyone but Paul on Guns of Brixton. It's almost hip hop.
"They don't think it be like it is, but it do." - Oscar Gamble
Re: Clash voices
cwooked cwooked BEAT
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
- Wolter
- Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
- Posts: 55432
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
- Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!
Re: Clash voices
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson
"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"
"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"