You keep wondering, don't you? A buddy of mine has a friend who lives in Savannah. The guy lives a month-to-month existence, working as a security guard. No health insurance because he just can't afford it. Last month he developed bladder stones or kidney stones. A ninety minute hospital visit that included pain killers and fluids and x-rays resulted in a $2500 bill. He's in negotiations with the hospital for a payment schedule. I keep thinking, how can a society exist with so much insecurity? Revolutions occur when a sufficient number realize that they really have nothing left to lose, and the fuck-you free-market-raping going on would seem to be pushing things in that direction. Or doing its best to.JulieJazz wrote:I am 100% opposed to the 700 billion dollar bailout. I think it is time that individuals should NO LONGER be protected by the legal entity of "the corporation" when making detrimental mistakes. It is high time that executives should be held PERSONALLY accountable. I am even more sickened by the huge payouts these fuckers have been getting when let go from their company. If you do a shitty job, you do not deserve 20 - 40 million dollar severance packages! The average workers of these crap, large firms have to take the fall out both from customers (for decisions they did not make) and with the possibility of job loss. The public/tax payers have paid tremendously for this insipid greed. I think if I were an American now, I would be teetering on the edge of revolt.
Bedtime for Capitalism?
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 115989
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
"I never doubted myself for a minute for I knew that my monkey-strong bowels were girded with strength, like the loins of a dragon ribboned with fat and the opulence of buffalo dung." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
Capitalism trumps democracy
The marriage of American capitalism and democracy has always been a Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee affair — stormy and erratic since its hasty wedding.
By David Sirota
The marriage of American capitalism and democracy has always been a Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee affair — stormy and erratic since its hasty wedding. But during the debate over a Wall Street bailout last week, we watched that matrimonial knot unwind into a tangled tale of terror.
As a financial crisis became a political panic, capitalism murdered democracy (ironically, while pursuing a vaguely socialist bailout). Only, unlike a typical horror story, the dead body wasn't hidden, it was dumped in the nation's public square.
The fiasco started, like most, with unreasonable demands. Under threat of financial meltdown, capitalism's corporate lobbyists asked our democracy to forsake its usual deliberations and hand over $700 billion of taxpayer money in less than a week.
Many were surprised when democracy responded with such valiant defiance. As television screens split between the floors of the stock exchange and the House of Representatives, lawmakers initially voted with their constituents and against the bailout.
That's when this husband-and-wife argument escalated into a grisly crime of passion.
CNN's Ali Velshi frothed that "the banks and the companies don't care about the intricacies" of democratic deliberations. A CEO angrily told CNN that "the money is being held hostage to the political process" — as if government resources are rightfully Wall Street's. And as the Dow tanked, the Chamber of Commerce threatened retribution against recalcitrant lawmakers.
The final deathblow came from TINA, shorthand for "There Is No Alternative" — the motto that Margaret Thatcher used to peddle her corporatism, and that Washington and Wall Street used to promote theirs.
Whether it was a Barclays Capital executive telling reporters "there is no choice" or Rep. Joe Crowley, D-N.Y., insisting that "this needs to be done and it needs to be done right away," responsibly democratic prescriptions were pulverized by capitalism's deranged mantra of inevitability and urgency.
To even mention, as economist Dean Baker did, that the taxpayer giveaway could exacerbate the crisis was to risk flogging by columnists like Tom Friedman. The sycophantic flat-earther vilified bailout opponents (i.e., most Americans) as mentally incapacitated deadbeats who "can't balance their own checkbooks."
By the time the fight hit Congress' upper chamber, senatorial morticians were embalming democracy's corpse. Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., permitted consideration of just one alternative, and he rigged parliamentary procedure to guarantee its defeat.
Yet, if capitalism took democracy's life through a perverse legislative process, then it robbed its grave with the bailout bill's substance.
American democracy is defined by vesting government power in systems and rules, not in individuals and whims. We have been, as John Adams wrote, "an empire of laws, and not of men" — until now.
Instead of responding to this meltdown by updating regulatory institutions or investing in job-creating infrastructure, the bailout gives one unelected appointee — the Treasury secretary — complete authority to dole out $700 billion to bank executives, with little oversight. And here's the scary part: That lurch toward dictatorship was motivated not just by crony corruption, but also by a deeper ideological shift.
We now face market forces uninhibited by democratic governance — Chinese dictators and Saudi princes can move trillions of dollars without so much as a news release. Thisbailout, marketed as a speed enhancer, is an aggressive attempt to discard democracy's checks and balances and pantomime that kind of autocracy.
While our political culture still required a public sales job (thus, the fearmongering), the bill's czarism aims to permanently euthanize democracy in the name of improving our capitalism's global agility. In that sense, last week's spousal killing wasn't random. It was the beginning of a systematic assault on our Constitution and a radical departure from Franklin Roosevelt's original covenant — a dangerous "new deal" we should have said "no deal" to.
David Sirota, author of "The Uprising," is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network. His blog is at http://www.credoaction.com/sirota
The marriage of American capitalism and democracy has always been a Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee affair — stormy and erratic since its hasty wedding.
By David Sirota
The marriage of American capitalism and democracy has always been a Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee affair — stormy and erratic since its hasty wedding. But during the debate over a Wall Street bailout last week, we watched that matrimonial knot unwind into a tangled tale of terror.
As a financial crisis became a political panic, capitalism murdered democracy (ironically, while pursuing a vaguely socialist bailout). Only, unlike a typical horror story, the dead body wasn't hidden, it was dumped in the nation's public square.
The fiasco started, like most, with unreasonable demands. Under threat of financial meltdown, capitalism's corporate lobbyists asked our democracy to forsake its usual deliberations and hand over $700 billion of taxpayer money in less than a week.
Many were surprised when democracy responded with such valiant defiance. As television screens split between the floors of the stock exchange and the House of Representatives, lawmakers initially voted with their constituents and against the bailout.
That's when this husband-and-wife argument escalated into a grisly crime of passion.
CNN's Ali Velshi frothed that "the banks and the companies don't care about the intricacies" of democratic deliberations. A CEO angrily told CNN that "the money is being held hostage to the political process" — as if government resources are rightfully Wall Street's. And as the Dow tanked, the Chamber of Commerce threatened retribution against recalcitrant lawmakers.
The final deathblow came from TINA, shorthand for "There Is No Alternative" — the motto that Margaret Thatcher used to peddle her corporatism, and that Washington and Wall Street used to promote theirs.
Whether it was a Barclays Capital executive telling reporters "there is no choice" or Rep. Joe Crowley, D-N.Y., insisting that "this needs to be done and it needs to be done right away," responsibly democratic prescriptions were pulverized by capitalism's deranged mantra of inevitability and urgency.
To even mention, as economist Dean Baker did, that the taxpayer giveaway could exacerbate the crisis was to risk flogging by columnists like Tom Friedman. The sycophantic flat-earther vilified bailout opponents (i.e., most Americans) as mentally incapacitated deadbeats who "can't balance their own checkbooks."
By the time the fight hit Congress' upper chamber, senatorial morticians were embalming democracy's corpse. Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., permitted consideration of just one alternative, and he rigged parliamentary procedure to guarantee its defeat.
Yet, if capitalism took democracy's life through a perverse legislative process, then it robbed its grave with the bailout bill's substance.
American democracy is defined by vesting government power in systems and rules, not in individuals and whims. We have been, as John Adams wrote, "an empire of laws, and not of men" — until now.
Instead of responding to this meltdown by updating regulatory institutions or investing in job-creating infrastructure, the bailout gives one unelected appointee — the Treasury secretary — complete authority to dole out $700 billion to bank executives, with little oversight. And here's the scary part: That lurch toward dictatorship was motivated not just by crony corruption, but also by a deeper ideological shift.
We now face market forces uninhibited by democratic governance — Chinese dictators and Saudi princes can move trillions of dollars without so much as a news release. Thisbailout, marketed as a speed enhancer, is an aggressive attempt to discard democracy's checks and balances and pantomime that kind of autocracy.
While our political culture still required a public sales job (thus, the fearmongering), the bill's czarism aims to permanently euthanize democracy in the name of improving our capitalism's global agility. In that sense, last week's spousal killing wasn't random. It was the beginning of a systematic assault on our Constitution and a radical departure from Franklin Roosevelt's original covenant — a dangerous "new deal" we should have said "no deal" to.
David Sirota, author of "The Uprising," is a fellow at the Campaign for America's Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network. His blog is at http://www.credoaction.com/sirota
then don't go killing all the bees
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 115989
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
Sirota echoes one of the themes in John Dean's Broken Government. To Dean, contemporary coverage of politics is too obsessed with policy instead of process. Good process, Dean argues, leads to good policy; haphazard or no process leading to good policy is blind luck. Authoritarian Republicans, who believe that government doesn't work anyway, are not interested in learning or employing proper process for investigating, creating, and enacting legislation. They are more comfortable with rule by fiat. No surprise, then, that policy for the last eight years has been short-sighted and contemptuous of legislative tradition and democratic ideals. It all becomes self-fulfilling prophecy: want proof that government doesn't work? Elect Republicans and they'll prove it doesn't work because they don't believe it can or should. No employer would ever survive hiring people who don't believe in their jobs and deliberately seek to fuck it up. Yet American voters for the past thirty odd years have participated in a self-fulfilling prophecy.
"I never doubted myself for a minute for I knew that my monkey-strong bowels were girded with strength, like the loins of a dragon ribboned with fat and the opulence of buffalo dung." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
Never thought of it that way. It ignores the greed factor but seems true enough otherwise.Dr. Medulla wrote:Sirota echoes one of the themes in John Dean's Broken Government. To Dean, contemporary coverage of politics is too obsessed with policy instead of process. Good process, Dean argues, leads to good policy; haphazard or no process leading to good policy is blind luck. Authoritarian Republicans, who believe that government doesn't work anyway, are not interested in learning or employing proper process for investigating, creating, and enacting legislation. They are more comfortable with rule by fiat. No surprise, then, that policy for the last eight years has been short-sighted and contemptuous of legislative tradition and democratic ideals. It all becomes self-fulfilling prophecy: want proof that government doesn't work? Elect Republicans and they'll prove it doesn't work because they don't believe it can or should. No employer would ever survive hiring people who don't believe in their jobs and deliberately seek to fuck it up. Yet American voters for the past thirty odd years have participated in a self-fulfilling prophecy.
then don't go killing all the bees
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 115989
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
"I never doubted myself for a minute for I knew that my monkey-strong bowels were girded with strength, like the loins of a dragon ribboned with fat and the opulence of buffalo dung." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35802
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
Oh yeah, I saw that when it aired. Really funny.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
I love this picture! I need more pictures of investment drones crying about the markets collapsing. Feed me! Feed me!
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
- BostonBeaneater
- Autonomous Insect Cyborg Sentinel
- Posts: 11944
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:24pm
- Location: Between the moon and New York City
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
C'mon over here sweetheart. I'll make you feel better.eumaas wrote:
I love this picture! I need more pictures of investment drones crying about the markets collapsing. Feed me! Feed me!
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
I totes thought that was Lindsay Lohan and Samantha Ronson.BostonBeaneater wrote:C'mon over here sweetheart. I'll make you feel better.eumaas wrote:
I love this picture! I need more pictures of investment drones crying about the markets collapsing. Feed me! Feed me!
Got a Rake? Sure!
IMCT: Inane Middle-Class Twats - Dr. M
" *sigh* it's right when they throw the penis pump out the window." -Hoy
IMCT: Inane Middle-Class Twats - Dr. M
" *sigh* it's right when they throw the penis pump out the window." -Hoy
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
I met Samantha Ronson and all I got was a lousy story.JennyB wrote:I totes thought that was Lindsay Lohan and Samantha Ronson.BostonBeaneater wrote:C'mon over here sweetheart. I'll make you feel better.eumaas wrote:
I love this picture! I need more pictures of investment drones crying about the markets collapsing. Feed me! Feed me!
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 115989
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
"I never doubted myself for a minute for I knew that my monkey-strong bowels were girded with strength, like the loins of a dragon ribboned with fat and the opulence of buffalo dung." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
- BostonBeaneater
- Autonomous Insect Cyborg Sentinel
- Posts: 11944
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:24pm
- Location: Between the moon and New York City
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
Beautiful!Dr. Medulla wrote:
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
That's an old IWW (my union!) poster: http://www.iww.org/graphics/documents/p ... yramid.gifBostonBeaneater wrote:Beautiful!Dr. Medulla wrote:
http://www.iww.org
I just posted a few days ago about the IWW's Sex Workers union (it's under the Public Service department, IU No. 690):
http://www.iww.org/unions/dept600/iu690/
Which means there are anarcho-syndicalist strippers out there.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
- Flex
- Mechano-Man of the Future
- Posts: 35802
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
- Location: The Information Superhighway!
Re: Bedtime for Capitalism?
Whenever I think life sucks, I remember this fact.eumaas wrote:Which means there are anarcho-syndicalist strippers out there.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead
Pex Lives!