Pitchfork explores London Calling
-
Chuck Mangione
- Spitting Image
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: 17 Jun 2009, 10:45pm
- Location: Up your boulevard.
-
Low Down Low
- Unknown Immortal
- Posts: 5025
- Joined: 21 Aug 2014, 9:08am
Re: Pitchfork explores London Calling
Who’s this Sim-oh-nin guy of whom he speaks?
- WestwayKid
- Unknown Immortal
- Posts: 6778
- Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 8:22am
- Location: Mill-e-wah-que
Re: Pitchfork explores London Calling
I wonder how low of a score Pitchfork would have given LC had it been released in 2018? I mean, nobody in the band had a beard or even an ironic mustache!?
"They don't think it be like it is, but it do." - Oscar Gamble
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116665
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Pitchfork explores London Calling
I'm confident that it would have been given a 5.167. Certainly no better than a 5.169. But the neo-dystopian retrograde futurism would not have played well to the long-suffering Pitchfork reviewers.WestwayKid wrote: ↑17 Apr 2018, 6:45amI wonder how low of a score Pitchfork would have given LC had it been released in 2018? I mean, nobody in the band had a beard or even an ironic mustache!?
"I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back in Whittier, they're not much bigger than two meters.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft