Not without quibbles, but I thought this was basically a good piece on bias against Sanders.
My impressions at the time was that the press coverage—the critical, that is—was coded in a caricature of Millennials as unserious, lazy, and fantasy-driven. Clinton was for adults (Boomers) with long resumés and know-how to apply the same solutions to any given problem. There's almost certainly a lot of my own analytical bias in all that, but the anti-Sanders coverage was generational.
Pretty good. Looks like Assange has probably gone nuts. Still, Podesta emails have been revealing. It's interesting to get a glimpse into how the ruling class operates.
Pretty good. Looks like Assange has probably gone nuts. Still, Podesta emails have been revealing. It's interesting to get a glimpse into how the ruling class operates.
Meh. InfoWars has much better meth supply nowadays after the recent Editorial exodus from BB. Way to settle for 2nd-best, lardbutt.
It's a temp gig. He's going to be the next Sen. Blutarsky. He hopes he can count on your vote.
Re: The IMCT Media Criticism Thread
Posted: 04 Nov 2016, 12:16pm
by Inder
Re: The IMCT Media Criticism Thread
Posted: 04 Nov 2016, 12:27pm
by Marky Dread
Inder wrote:
That's made me feel a little better. The same institution that banned it from reaching number 1 all those years ago. Now happy to replace the official anthem with the Sex Pistols. At last job done.