The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Politics and other such topical creams.
Marky Dread
User avatar
Messiah of the Milk Bar
Posts: 36943
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 11:26am

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by Marky Dread » 13 May 2010, 6:26pm

eumaas wrote:This is actually an interesting moral question and a good use of the thread: is dealing drugs intrinsically immoral? If so, what distinguishes a drug dealer in a moral sense from a barman?
Or selling fire arms. All these things in the hands of the wrong person can be lethal to others. If you wanna drink yourself stupid or smoke yourself mental or fire a gun at targets then you're going to find a way of doing so inspite of what any law may or may not say'

Just do what you do to yourself and don't hurt anybody else in the process, loved ones, innocent bystanders etc...

In answer to your question my reply is nothing.
"NIBBLED TO DEATH BY AN OKAPI"

Silent Majority
User avatar
Singer-Songwriter Nancy
Posts: 13367
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 8:28pm
Location: A republic of mind
Contact:

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by Silent Majority » 13 May 2010, 6:42pm

eumaas wrote:This is actually an interesting moral question and a good use of the thread: is dealing drugs intrinsically immoral? If so, what distinguishes a drug dealer in a moral sense from a barman?
Only for heroin and crack. Everything else is recreation, they're poison.
Not teargas nor baton charge
That stops you taking the city


www.pexlives.libsyn.com/

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23197
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: outer space

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by eumaas » 13 May 2010, 6:43pm

Silent Majority wrote:
eumaas wrote:This is actually an interesting moral question and a good use of the thread: is dealing drugs intrinsically immoral? If so, what distinguishes a drug dealer in a moral sense from a barman?
Only for heroin and crack. Everything else is recreation, they're poison.
Meth is highly addictive.

Booze doesn't exactly have a good track record either.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Silent Majority
User avatar
Singer-Songwriter Nancy
Posts: 13367
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 8:28pm
Location: A republic of mind
Contact:

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by Silent Majority » 13 May 2010, 6:48pm

eumaas wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:
eumaas wrote:This is actually an interesting moral question and a good use of the thread: is dealing drugs intrinsically immoral? If so, what distinguishes a drug dealer in a moral sense from a barman?
Only for heroin and crack. Everything else is recreation, they're poison.
Meth is highly addictive.

Booze doesn't exactly have a good track record either.
It's not exactly smack though, is it?
Not teargas nor baton charge
That stops you taking the city


www.pexlives.libsyn.com/

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 25789
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!
Contact:

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by Flex » 13 May 2010, 6:49pm

I guess the question (leaving aside whether we have a moral obligation to obey the law) is it intrinsically immoral to take heroin or crack (or whatever your anti-drug du jour is). If it isn't, is it still immoral to supply it? If it is, what makes it immoral?
"I live inside my own heart, Matt Damon." - Prince

Sous les pavés, la plage.

Pex Lives!

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23197
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: outer space

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by eumaas » 13 May 2010, 7:01pm

Silent Majority wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:
eumaas wrote:This is actually an interesting moral question and a good use of the thread: is dealing drugs intrinsically immoral? If so, what distinguishes a drug dealer in a moral sense from a barman?
Only for heroin and crack. Everything else is recreation, they're poison.
Meth is highly addictive.

Booze doesn't exactly have a good track record either.
It's not exactly smack though, is it?
I'm pretty sure booze kills more every year than smack, buddy.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Silent Majority
User avatar
Singer-Songwriter Nancy
Posts: 13367
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 8:28pm
Location: A republic of mind
Contact:

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by Silent Majority » 13 May 2010, 7:03pm

Flex wrote:I guess the question (leaving aside whether we have a moral obligation to obey the law) is it intrinsically immoral to take heroin or crack (or whatever your anti-drug du jour is). If it isn't, is it still immoral to supply it? If it is, what makes it immoral?
Is it immoral to shoot yourself in the head? No, it's a cowardly escape from reality. Is it immoral to hand over the loaded gun for your own financial gain? I think so.
Not teargas nor baton charge
That stops you taking the city


www.pexlives.libsyn.com/

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 25789
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!
Contact:

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by Flex » 13 May 2010, 7:04pm

Silent Majority wrote:
Flex wrote:I guess the question (leaving aside whether we have a moral obligation to obey the law) is it intrinsically immoral to take heroin or crack (or whatever your anti-drug du jour is). If it isn't, is it still immoral to supply it? If it is, what makes it immoral?
Is it immoral to shoot yourself in the head? No, it's a cowardly escape from reality. Is it immoral to hand over the loaded gun for your own financial gain? I think so.
Are bartenders guilty of belonging to an immoral profession? More people die of alcohol abuse than heroin overdoses every year.
"I live inside my own heart, Matt Damon." - Prince

Sous les pavés, la plage.

Pex Lives!

Marky Dread
User avatar
Messiah of the Milk Bar
Posts: 36943
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 11:26am

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by Marky Dread » 13 May 2010, 7:04pm

eumaas wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:
eumaas wrote:This is actually an interesting moral question and a good use of the thread: is dealing drugs intrinsically immoral? If so, what distinguishes a drug dealer in a moral sense from a barman?
Only for heroin and crack. Everything else is recreation, they're poison.
Meth is highly addictive.

Booze doesn't exactly have a good track record either.
It's not exactly smack though, is it?
I'm pretty sure booze kills more every year than smack, buddy.
Acceptability is to blame.
"NIBBLED TO DEATH BY AN OKAPI"

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23197
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: outer space

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by eumaas » 13 May 2010, 7:07pm

Marky Dread wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Silent Majority wrote: Only for heroin and crack. Everything else is recreation, they're poison.
Meth is highly addictive.

Booze doesn't exactly have a good track record either.
It's not exactly smack though, is it?
I'm pretty sure booze kills more every year than smack, buddy.
Acceptability is to blame.
If we had a culture that lauded heroin use--like say if instead of taking a drink at the end of each Law and Order, they shot up--then it would affect usage rates, sure.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 74783
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by Dr. Medulla » 13 May 2010, 7:07pm

Silent Majority wrote:
Flex wrote:I guess the question (leaving aside whether we have a moral obligation to obey the law) is it intrinsically immoral to take heroin or crack (or whatever your anti-drug du jour is). If it isn't, is it still immoral to supply it? If it is, what makes it immoral?
Is it immoral to shoot yourself in the head? No, it's a cowardly escape from reality.
I don't buy the notion that suicide is cowardly. If you should be able to live your life the way you want, that includes deciding when you want to check out. No one knows what goes on in someone else's head, so I could never declare suicide a cowardly action.
Endut! Hoch Hech!

I feel that, had he lived, John Lennon would have loved Donkey Kong.

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 25789
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!
Contact:

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by Flex » 13 May 2010, 7:18pm

A thought: I'm not sure that acceptability is necessarily a negative regarding death rates. When one looks at heroin overdoses, the majority are caused by taking heroin when other drugs or alcohol are already in the system. Some legitimization of heroin use, combined with improved education on how to use it more safely could actually lead to lower death-rate.
"I live inside my own heart, Matt Damon." - Prince

Sous les pavés, la plage.

Pex Lives!

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23197
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: outer space

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by eumaas » 13 May 2010, 7:21pm

Dr. Medulla wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:
Flex wrote:I guess the question (leaving aside whether we have a moral obligation to obey the law) is it intrinsically immoral to take heroin or crack (or whatever your anti-drug du jour is). If it isn't, is it still immoral to supply it? If it is, what makes it immoral?
Is it immoral to shoot yourself in the head? No, it's a cowardly escape from reality.
I don't buy the notion that suicide is cowardly. If you should be able to live your life the way you want, that includes deciding when you want to check out. No one knows what goes on in someone else's head, so I could never declare suicide a cowardly action.
I agree that suicide isn't necessarily cowardly. For one thing, it's highly unlikely that there's an afterlife, so extinguishing your consciousness under those circumstances would sometimes require taking a risk, which to me is opposed to cowardice.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Marky Dread
User avatar
Messiah of the Milk Bar
Posts: 36943
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 11:26am

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by Marky Dread » 13 May 2010, 7:45pm

eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:
Flex wrote:I guess the question (leaving aside whether we have a moral obligation to obey the law) is it intrinsically immoral to take heroin or crack (or whatever your anti-drug du jour is). If it isn't, is it still immoral to supply it? If it is, what makes it immoral?
Is it immoral to shoot yourself in the head? No, it's a cowardly escape from reality.
I don't buy the notion that suicide is cowardly. If you should be able to live your life the way you want, that includes deciding when you want to check out. No one knows what goes on in someone else's head, so I could never declare suicide a cowardly action.
I agree that suicide isn't necessarily cowardly. For one thing, it's highly unlikely that there's an afterlife, so extinguishing your consciousness under those circumstances would sometimes require taking a risk, which to me is opposed to cowardice.
I think people call it cowardly when faced with the option of carrying on is the harder option.

The only thing I dislike about suicide is the selfish way in which some choose to end their lives. In the 80's while working for the Postal service offloading mail trains one xmas I was awaiting the arrival of the next mail train. The platform anouncer called across the tannoy the next train was a through train (non stopping) as this train passed through the station a guy ran out from behind me and threw himself in front of the train his blood shot across me onto my face and clothes as he was dragged down the line.
"NIBBLED TO DEATH BY AN OKAPI"

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23197
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: outer space

Re: The John Terry Moral Reasoning Thread

Post by eumaas » 13 May 2010, 7:47pm

Marky Dread wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Silent Majority wrote:
Flex wrote:I guess the question (leaving aside whether we have a moral obligation to obey the law) is it intrinsically immoral to take heroin or crack (or whatever your anti-drug du jour is). If it isn't, is it still immoral to supply it? If it is, what makes it immoral?
Is it immoral to shoot yourself in the head? No, it's a cowardly escape from reality.
I don't buy the notion that suicide is cowardly. If you should be able to live your life the way you want, that includes deciding when you want to check out. No one knows what goes on in someone else's head, so I could never declare suicide a cowardly action.
I agree that suicide isn't necessarily cowardly. For one thing, it's highly unlikely that there's an afterlife, so extinguishing your consciousness under those circumstances would sometimes require taking a risk, which to me is opposed to cowardice.
I think people call it cowardly when faced with the option of carrying on is the harder option.

The only thing I dislike about suicide is the selfish way in which some choose to end their lives. In the 80's while working for the Postal service offloading mail trains one xmas I was awaiting the arrival of the next mail train. The platform anouncer called across the tannoy the next train was a through train (non stopping) as this train passed through the station a guy ran out from behind me and threw himself in front of the train his blood shot across me onto my face and clothes as he was dragged down the line.
I agree there. Best to do it in a cleanly, considerate fashion.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests