Will the real Shakespeare please stand up?
Posted: 30 Apr 2009, 9:00pm
I'm sure this is probably old news to some but what do you think of this?
http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/
http://www.shakespeare-oxford.com/
Well, to be fair, your kind are filthy, brainless mongrels.Wolter wrote:I think it hides a hidden elitism. Oh, Shakespeare couldn't have been some dirty actor. It had to be a nobleman.
My other, less class-war-based take.Colin wrote:Nobody is ever going to know for sure. People should just enjoy the plays without being preoccupied with questions about their authorship.
I admit that I have only a superficial knowledge of the critique, but isn't it rooted in part in the notion that knowledge of other civilizations, especially royal families, suggests a mobility and access denied to most commoners? For historical detective work, that seems a very fair question to raise.Wolter wrote:I think it hides a hidden elitism. Oh, Shakespeare couldn't have been some dirty actor. It had to be a nobleman.
Not me. I'm totally single bullet on the Shakespeare front.tepista wrote:Shakespiricy
I think it was Wolt who first informed me that there was no such thing as Shakespeare
Lee Harvey Oswald wrote all of Shakespeare's plays and most of his sonnets?Wolter wrote:Not me. I'm totally single bullet on the Shakespeare front.tepista wrote:Shakespiricy
I think it was Wolt who first informed me that there was no such thing as Shakespeare
Flex wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald wrote all of Shakespeare's plays and most of his sonnets?Wolter wrote:Not me. I'm totally single bullet on the Shakespeare front.tepista wrote:Shakespiricy
I think it was Wolt who first informed me that there was no such thing as Shakespeare
Yeah! That might have been the turning point when I went from being annoyed by Steakhead to hating him. Ah, the seduction of sweeping and extremist statements …Still216 wrote:One of my favorite IMCT/Satch's blow-ups was when SalsburrySteak5000 or Guitar Wolf Stealth or one of them said something to the effect of "Shakespeare is one of the worst writers of all time". I may have to search the archives now..
It seems more than plausible to me that a Glove maker's son could educate himself. I think we treat the past as though people were completely different just because it was before we were born. Touring up and down the land and speaking to people in Taverns you're bound to learn some things.For an actor old scripts could be a wealth of information,Dr. Medulla wrote:I admit that I have only a superficial knowledge of the critique, but isn't it rooted in part in the notion that knowledge of other civilizations, especially royal families, suggests a mobility and access denied to most commoners? For historical detective work, that seems a very fair question to raise.Wolter wrote:I think it hides a hidden elitism. Oh, Shakespeare couldn't have been some dirty actor. It had to be a nobleman.