Page 3 of 8
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 3:31pm
by eumaas
Flex wrote:Listening now, it bugs me that they keep talking about an "anarchist state." One which, presumably, we wouldn't last 48 hours in.
"Let me mention a few assassins that I picked up when I read the wiki page while ignoring the many pacifists including Tolstoy, Gandhi, and Buber also listed there..."
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 5:21pm
by eumaas
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 5:27pm
by Flex
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 5:29pm
by eumaas
Flex wrote:
Wow, what an asshole.
Stephan Kinsella wrote:Adolf Hitler wrote:...die Untermenschen...
I don't see any problem with that.
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 5:38pm
by Wolter
Flex wrote:
Wow, what an asshole.
What an elitist dolt.
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 6:54pm
by Dr. Medulla
Wolter wrote:Flex wrote:
Wow, what an asshole.
What an elitist dolt.
Spoken like the parasitic untermenschen you are.
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 6:56pm
by eumaas
Dr. Medulla wrote:Wolter wrote:Flex wrote:
Wow, what an asshole.
What an elitist dolt.
Spoken like the parasitic untermenschen you are.
Dr. Medsella?
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 7:04pm
by Dr. Medulla
eumaas wrote:Dr. Medulla wrote:Wolter wrote:Flex wrote:
Wow, what an asshole.
What an elitist dolt.
Spoken like the parasitic untermenschen you are.
Dr. Medsella?
It can now be revealed that it's not Medulla. It's …
Mengele.
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 7:08pm
by eumaas
Dr. Medulla wrote:eumaas wrote:Dr. Medulla wrote:Wolter wrote:Flex wrote:
Wow, what an asshole.
What an elitist dolt.
Spoken like the parasitic untermenschen you are.
Dr. Medsella?
It can now be revealed that it's not Medulla. It's …
Mengele.
Is Mengele a libertarian? Some days, I wouldn't be surprised.
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 7:28pm
by Dr. Medulla
eumaas wrote:Dr. Medulla wrote:eumaas wrote:Dr. Medulla wrote:Wolter wrote:
What an elitist dolt.
Spoken like the parasitic untermenschen you are.
Dr. Medsella?
It can now be revealed that it's not Medulla. It's …
Mengele.
Is Mengele a libertarian? Some days, I wouldn't be surprised.
More of a Peckian clonist.
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 9:26pm
by eumaas
Wolter wrote:Flex wrote:
Wow, what an asshole.
What an elitist dolt.
More "libertarian" elitism:
http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/201 ... power.html
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 9:50pm
by Flex
Terrible. The masturbatory comments make me wanna puke, too.
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 9:53pm
by eumaas
Flex wrote:
Terrible. The masturbatory comments make me wanna puke, too.
And then they wonder why socialists say that free market economics is an ideological construct used to support those in power.
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 10:06pm
by Dr. Medulla
eumaas wrote:Flex wrote:
Terrible. The masturbatory comments make me wanna puke, too.
And then they wonder why socialists say that free market economics is an ideological construct used to support those in power.
The basic economics: If managers don't add value, why do CEOs hire them? It's not enough to say, "Because of government regulation."
How about group-think business philosophy that dictates all businesses have to do X, Y, & Z even if it makes no practical sense? How about that upper levels engage in senseless activity just to be active, and creating new levels of "management" is a means of putting your stamp on things without genuinely doing anything except perhaps create loyalists in the middle levels (and, well, help make the company sluggish and obese)?
Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?
Posted: 21 Jan 2010, 10:09pm
by eumaas
Dr. Medulla wrote:eumaas wrote:Flex wrote:
Terrible. The masturbatory comments make me wanna puke, too.
And then they wonder why socialists say that free market economics is an ideological construct used to support those in power.
The basic economics: If managers don't add value, why do CEOs hire them? It's not enough to say, "Because of government regulation."
How about group-think business philosophy that dictates all businesses have to do X, Y, & Z even if it makes no practical sense? How about that upper levels engage in senseless activity just to be active, and creating new levels of "management" is a means of putting your stamp on things without genuinely doing anything except perhaps create loyalists in the middle levels (and, well, help make the company sluggish and obese)?
Add to that a distorted market where business failure is met with bailouts as well as numerous other distortions of market processes and incentives, and what do you get?