A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Politics and other such topical creams.
Post Reply
eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 22595
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: Carrboro/Alamut

A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by eumaas » 01 Apr 2009, 1:32pm

This could be an April Fool's joke, but apparently left-libertarian Sheldon Richman is going to be on Glenn Beck's Fox show at 5pm.
"The only thing that really occurs to me that I can say on this is to point out how fascinating it is that the Hassan-i-Sabbah archetype keeps turning up over and over again ... He disappears up into the mountains and is never seen again. Believe me, he'll never be seen again. He'll live forever because of that."

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Woody Allen
Posts: 49227
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!
Contact:

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by Wolter » 01 Apr 2009, 1:38pm

Must be a joke. Like everything Glenn Beck does, it is sure to be an elaborate piece of Guerrilla Theatre.
"There's something more honest, he believed, about traditional methods of mass starvation, labour camps, and machine gunning millions to death. Stalin was a vinyl guy who sneered at Truman converting everything to compact disc." - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 22595
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: Carrboro/Alamut

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by eumaas » 01 Apr 2009, 1:43pm

Wolter wrote:Must be a joke.
http://fee.org/articles/freeman-editor- ... k-tonight/
Like everything Glenn Beck does, it is sure to be an elaborate piece of Guerrilla Theatre.
I've argued with libertarians before about Glenn Beck. I think he's a snake in the grass and not to be trusted at all. Just two years ago he was calling Ron Paul supporters (who are moderate libertarians, just loopy) terrorists. Also, he made my dad spit fire--my dad wanted to get quick headline news and there'd be Beck blathering away about patriotism and rah rah war. Beck still supports the war in Iraq, whatever his alleged shift in allegiance. I'm fine with broad alliances and people changing their views, but Beck is fishy fishy fishy. I'm not gonna be his mark--fuck that guy.
"The only thing that really occurs to me that I can say on this is to point out how fascinating it is that the Hassan-i-Sabbah archetype keeps turning up over and over again ... He disappears up into the mountains and is never seen again. Believe me, he'll never be seen again. He'll live forever because of that."

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Woody Allen
Posts: 49227
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!
Contact:

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by Wolter » 01 Apr 2009, 1:45pm

Kidding aside: Glenn Beck is an awful man. Possibly the worst of the mainstream news hosts.
"There's something more honest, he believed, about traditional methods of mass starvation, labour camps, and machine gunning millions to death. Stalin was a vinyl guy who sneered at Truman converting everything to compact disc." - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 71088
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by Dr. Medulla » 01 Apr 2009, 1:56pm

Wolter wrote:Kidding aside: Glenn Beck is an awful man. Possibly the worst of the mainstream news hosts.
If you haven't read Alan Brinkley's Voices of Protest, it's instructive of the kind of dangerous populist thugs who emerge in a crisis. Beck is a cynical charlatan feasting off anxieties and channeling them for his own interest.
Walrus birth doesn't make good breakfast conversation!

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 22595
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: Carrboro/Alamut

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by eumaas » 01 Apr 2009, 2:03pm

Wolter wrote:Kidding aside: Glenn Beck is an awful man. Possibly the worst of the mainstream news hosts.
Truly a shithead. He does no help for any good cause--he might be getting ideas out there, but they're vulgarized ideas stripped of the ethical content and economic reasoning that makes them potent. There are already so many misconceptions about anarchist and minarchist thought--don't need that jagoff muddying the waters.
"The only thing that really occurs to me that I can say on this is to point out how fascinating it is that the Hassan-i-Sabbah archetype keeps turning up over and over again ... He disappears up into the mountains and is never seen again. Believe me, he'll never be seen again. He'll live forever because of that."

IkarisOne
User avatar
Unknown Immortal
Posts: 2841
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 10:09pm

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by IkarisOne » 01 Apr 2009, 2:32pm

Beck has compared himself to Howard Beale. He is- he's the post-Arthur Jensen lecture Beale.

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Woody Allen
Posts: 49227
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!
Contact:

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by Wolter » 01 Apr 2009, 2:35pm

IkarisOne wrote:Beck has compared himself to Howard Beale. He is- he's the post-Arthur Jensen lecture Beale.
Awesome.
"There's something more honest, he believed, about traditional methods of mass starvation, labour camps, and machine gunning millions to death. Stalin was a vinyl guy who sneered at Truman converting everything to compact disc." - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

Mimi
User avatar
Goddess of the Underworld
Posts: 5006
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:36pm
Location: Down in the pit

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by Mimi » 01 Apr 2009, 3:37pm

Wolter wrote:Kidding aside: Glenn Beck is an awful man. Possibly the worst of the mainstream news hosts.
This!

Rat Patrol
User avatar
Unknown Immortal
Posts: 14573
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 9:23pm
Location: A flat burning junkheap for twenty square miles

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by Rat Patrol » 01 Apr 2009, 8:00pm

[youtube]
[/youtube]

[youtube]
[/youtube]
Image

tepista
User avatar
Foul-Mouthed Werewolf
Posts: 31897
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 11:25am
Location: Livin on a fault line, Waiting on the big one

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by tepista » 03 Apr 2009, 12:25pm

The only reason I know who Beck is is cuz of Stewart/Colbert. He is truly a clown. The Doom Bunker parody was fucking hilarious.
We reach the parts other combos cannot reach
We beach the beachheads other armies cannot beach
We speak the tongues other mouths cannot speak

arsebundren77
User avatar
Junco Partner
Posts: 301
Joined: 18 Jun 2008, 7:32pm
Location: The Maritimes

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by arsebundren77 » 03 Apr 2009, 10:39pm

So this Glen Beck guy is for real? He's like Jimmy Swaggart crossed with Rush Limbaugh. Mmmm... playmates and painkillers. Delicious.

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 71088
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by Dr. Medulla » 05 Apr 2009, 10:59am

Jonah Goldberg, you've got a friend in Glenn Beck …
[youtube]
[/youtube]
Walrus birth doesn't make good breakfast conversation!

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 22595
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: Carrboro/Alamut

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by eumaas » 05 Apr 2009, 11:08am

Poor Sheldon.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,512218,00.html
This is a rush transcript from "Glenn Beck," April 1, 2009. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

GLENN BECK, HOST: Sheldon Richman from the Freeman Foundation for Economic Education — how are you, sir?

SHELDON RICHMAN, FOUNDATION FOR ECON. EDUCATION: I'm doing fine.

BECK: OK. I — first of all, am I wrong on this one, Sheldon? That what I'm seeing here is fascistic.

RICHMAN: You're not wrong. The only thing I would do is broaden your perspective a little bit. We've been on this road a very, very long time.

BECK: Oh, I think we've been on this road since Teddy Roosevelt. And — I mean, look, I want to show you something. This is — explain what this is. Do you have feedback? This is that — this is all the sticks bound together in the axis. It's the Roman symbol of fascism?

RICHMAN: This is what the fascists in Italy used as their symbol, which was this Roman depiction of a bundle of rods bound together with an ax coming out the top, which I assume is a symbol of a collective unity and force of power.

BECK: Right. OK, could you zoom in on this? Here it is — Harry, bring it forward a little bit. Zoom in right here.

This is — this is the Mercury Dime. On the back of the mercury dime — and Harry saw this earlier today. He works the gib camera that's zooming in right now. They look familiar? This is the symbol of fascism.

Who brought this dime in? It happened in 1916, Woodrow Wilson was the president. I didn't even put this together. We've have been on the road to fascism for a while.

So, let's do something here. I looked up the definition of fascism yesterday, and I want to — I want to break it down. The first part is — where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society's economic process through direct state operations of the means of production, fascism sought to control indirectly through the domination of nominally private owners.

Would you say that this is what's happening with G.M. right now? And AIG?

RICHMAN: Something similar is happening with those companies. Again, to keep it in context — and this is in no way defensive that I am against all of that — first of all, it began in — back September. As you pointed out, the Republicans and the left and right had done similar things.

BECK: You know, hang on, Sheldon, I don't know what you're — I don't know what you're trying to paint here. I am not saying that Barack Obama is a fascist.

RICHMAN: Right.

BECK: I'm not saying the Democrats are fascists. I'm saying the government under Bush and under Obama and under all of the presidents that we've seen or at least most of the presidents that we've seen for quite some time are slowly but surely moving us away from our republic and into a system of fascism.

Yes or no?

RICHMAN: No, I'm agreeing with you.

BECK: OK.

RICHMAN: I'm saying we've been on that road a very long time. We've been on that road for ages from the — into the 19th century. We — sometimes we take two steps forward and then one back; sometimes we take one step forward or two steps back. We've been on that road, and I agree with what you're saying. The G.M. and AIG situations are more — are more like fascism than socialism.

But I would add this one caveat and I don't approve of the policies, but I would just add this one caveat. These companies came to the government for help. They never should have gotten it.

BECK: But, if I'm not mistaken — if I'm not mistaken — in the early days of Adolf Hitler, they were — they were very happy to line up for help there as well. I mean, the companies were like, hey, wait a minute, we can get, you know, we can get out of trouble here, they can help, et cetera, et cetera.

You line up sometimes. You never want to give your rights away or your freedoms away for security. Our founders talked about this. We're giving our freedoms away. G.M., AIG, any of these banks, Citigroup — they're all giving their freedom away for security.

RICHMAN: You're right. We don't have an argument here. I was just keeping the context clear.

BECK: OK. The second thing is where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property — I love this — in the national interests, that is, as an autocratic authority conceived it; where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities.

So, what it does mean exactly? That's the public/private kind of relationship, is it not?

RICHMAN: Well, what I was trying to do there — and you're reading from my entry on the "Concise Encyclopedia of Economics" on fascism — I was trying to contrast it with socialism.

Under socialism, there was no facade of a free market or capitalism or whatever you want to call it. Everything was just nationalized, and the economy was just a government operation.

Under fascism, under Mussolini in Italy and then under Hitler in the '30s with the Nazis, they left intact what looked like private businesses, the government just dictated all the terms.

But in both cases of fascism and socialism, the market was effectively abolished. There was no marketplace. There was no bidding. There was no haggling. There was no market.

BECK: There was...

RICHMAN: And — so that makes — that should give us an important distinction of what's going on today. The market is not abolished in the United States.

BECK: Right.

RICHMAN: It is very heavily burdened by government, but that's not the same as abolishing it.

BECK: OK. Thank you very much. We'll talk again.
"The only thing that really occurs to me that I can say on this is to point out how fascinating it is that the Hassan-i-Sabbah archetype keeps turning up over and over again ... He disappears up into the mountains and is never seen again. Believe me, he'll never be seen again. He'll live forever because of that."

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 22595
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: Carrboro/Alamut

Re: A left-libertarian on Glenn Beck?

Post by eumaas » 06 Apr 2009, 12:13pm

"The only thing that really occurs to me that I can say on this is to point out how fascinating it is that the Hassan-i-Sabbah archetype keeps turning up over and over again ... He disappears up into the mountains and is never seen again. Believe me, he'll never be seen again. He'll live forever because of that."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests