The Future of the Republican Party

Politics and other such topical creams.
Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Woody Allen
Posts: 52577
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Wolter » 21 Sep 2016, 1:27pm

Dr. Medulla wrote:
BostonBeaneater wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:The Haight in '67 didn't have as many weirdos as the GOP does in 2016.
Nazis, White Nationalists, Cult members, swindlers, slanderers, there is a seat at the table for all! *


*except for blacks, jews, and queers.
You missed perverts. Lots and lots of perverts.
Oh yeah. Gotta have perverts.
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

BostonBeaneater
User avatar
Autonomous Insect Cyborg Sentinel
Posts: 9569
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:24pm
Location: Between the moon and New York City

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by BostonBeaneater » 21 Sep 2016, 2:03pm

Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
BostonBeaneater wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:The Haight in '67 didn't have as many weirdos as the GOP does in 2016.
Nazis, White Nationalists, Cult members, swindlers, slanderers, there is a seat at the table for all! *


*except for blacks, jews, and queers.
You missed perverts. Lots and lots of perverts.
Oh yeah. Gotta have perverts.
They belong to all parties:
Image
Image

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 84246
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 21 Sep 2016, 2:52pm

BostonBeaneater wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
BostonBeaneater wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:The Haight in '67 didn't have as many weirdos as the GOP does in 2016.
Nazis, White Nationalists, Cult members, swindlers, slanderers, there is a seat at the table for all! *


*except for blacks, jews, and queers.
You missed perverts. Lots and lots of perverts.
Oh yeah. Gotta have perverts.
They belong to all parties:
Image
Democrats generally have boring perverts. Bill Clinton might like a cigar that's been in Monica's vag, but Newt Gingrich probably like's them up a goat's. It's that extra English that they put on it.
Poonty, boloques, juffmunch, carpoo, snazellfonks.

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 84246
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 24 Sep 2016, 11:44am

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/ ... el-goldman

He's not wrong about conservatism and the Republican party—tho naive in thinking that the essence of the party since Nixon was white resentment—but curious that he doesn't see the Democrats as being a repository of the kind of conservatism that he's looking for. There's this kneejerk assumption that the Democrats are FDR, LBJ, and McGovern.
Poonty, boloques, juffmunch, carpoo, snazellfonks.

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 28279
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Flex » 25 Sep 2016, 1:48am

Dr. Medulla wrote:http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/ ... el-goldman

He's not wrong about conservatism and the Republican party—tho naive in thinking that the essence of the party since Nixon was white resentment—but curious that he doesn't see the Democrats as being a repository of the kind of conservatism that he's looking for. There's this kneejerk assumption that the Democrats are FDR, LBJ, and McGovern.
Yeah, I liked that article as far as it goes, but it's hard not to read his description of a future conservative party and not conclude the Dems already got there.
YOU MADE ONE MISTAKE, LENNON, YOU DOUBLE CROSSED MIKE LOVE AND LEFT HIM ALIVE

Sous les pavés, la plage.

Pex Lives!

tepista
User avatar
Foul-Mouthed Werewolf
Posts: 34026
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 11:25am
Location: Livin on a fault line, Waiting on the big one

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by tepista » 28 Sep 2016, 12:20pm

Image
We reach the parts other combos cannot reach
We beach the beachheads other armies cannot beach
We speak the tongues other mouths cannot speak

Rat Patrol
User avatar
Unknown Immortal
Posts: 15431
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 9:23pm
Location: A flat burning junkheap for twenty square miles

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Rat Patrol » 28 Sep 2016, 12:31pm

tepista wrote:Image
Brooose is #sowoke. :rolleyes:
Image

Silent Majority
User avatar
Singer-Songwriter Nancy
Posts: 15036
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 8:28pm
Location: A republic of mind
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Silent Majority » 28 Sep 2016, 1:52pm

Rat Patrol wrote:
tepista wrote:Image
Brooose is #sowoke. :rolleyes:
Not actually him, I believe.
There's a lot of wreckage in the ravine

www.pexlives.libsyn.com/

tepista
User avatar
Foul-Mouthed Werewolf
Posts: 34026
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 11:25am
Location: Livin on a fault line, Waiting on the big one

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by tepista » 28 Sep 2016, 3:07pm

Silent Majority wrote: Not actually him, I believe.
A cheap Springsteen knockoff? The nerve! He sings "Born to Jog" and "Visually Impaired by the Light" and "Tenth Avenue Cold Front"
We reach the parts other combos cannot reach
We beach the beachheads other armies cannot beach
We speak the tongues other mouths cannot speak

JennyB
User avatar
Clash Cuck
Posts: 18218
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 1:13pm
Location: Moranjortsville

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by JennyB » 28 Sep 2016, 4:25pm

tepista wrote:
Silent Majority wrote: Not actually him, I believe.
A cheap Springsteen knockoff? The nerve! He sings "Born to Jog" and "Visually Impaired by the Light" and "Tenth Avenue Cold Front"
"I'm slightly warm."
Got a Rake? Sure!

IMCT: Inane Middle-Class Twats - Dr. M

Don't talk shop.

Rat Patrol
User avatar
Unknown Immortal
Posts: 15431
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 9:23pm
Location: A flat burning junkheap for twenty square miles

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Rat Patrol » 28 Sep 2016, 4:27pm

Silent Majority wrote:
Rat Patrol wrote:
tepista wrote:Image
Brooose is #sowoke. :rolleyes:
Not actually him, I believe.
Brooose and his doppelganger are #sowoke.
Image

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 84246
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 06 Oct 2016, 7:29am



Maybe, says the right, we were too quick to judge the Communists so harshly …
Poonty, boloques, juffmunch, carpoo, snazellfonks.

matedog
User avatar
Purveyor of Hoyistic Thought
Posts: 21325
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 4:07pm
Location: 1995

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by matedog » 06 Oct 2016, 10:15am

Dr. Medulla wrote:

Maybe, says the right, we were too quick to judge the Communists so harshly …
I assumed that post was a joke. I didn't realize she is a conservative writer. Oof.
Look, you have to establish context for these things. And I maintain that unless you appreciate the Fall of Constantinople, the Great Fire of London, and Mickey Mantle's fatalist alcoholism, live Freddy makes no sense. If you want to half-ass it, fine, go call Simon Schama to do the appendix.

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 84246
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 06 Oct 2016, 10:43am

matedog wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:

Maybe, says the right, we were too quick to judge the Communists so harshly …
I assumed that post was a joke. I didn't realize she is a conservative writer. Oof.
So many self-described conservatives are so oblivious to the contradictions in their principles (and I use that term very charitably) because part of their schtick is overt hostility to any kind of intellectual rigour. Their beliefs are whatever they want at the moment, regardless of the greater significance underlying those desires. So, yeah, they'll seize upon tenets of Communism, Nazism, monarchism, libertarianism, and theocracy without any reflection on how these things might be problematic. You can't really argue with someone like that because it is, fundamentally, the worldview of an adolescent—I want what I want right now and I'll do anything I can to get it. No surprise that any serious conservative intellectuals no longer have a voice.
Poonty, boloques, juffmunch, carpoo, snazellfonks.

JennyB
User avatar
Clash Cuck
Posts: 18218
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 1:13pm
Location: Moranjortsville

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by JennyB » 06 Oct 2016, 12:35pm

Dr. Medulla wrote:

Maybe, says the right, we were too quick to judge the Communists so harshly …
"Mr. Gorbachev...keep up that wall!"
Got a Rake? Sure!

IMCT: Inane Middle-Class Twats - Dr. M

Don't talk shop.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests