Page 127 of 261

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 9:52am
by Dr. Medulla
The chickenshittery of these 2nd A people is well on display as they, predictably, deny any kind of violent intent behind the "joke." These are the same fuckers who weep about the flag and their pocket copy of the Constitution and how they're prepared to shed blood to defend both. They need all those guns because of tyranny and freedom and Jesus! C'mon, big boy, don't back off now because the issue's up front. Say that you're prepared to do it, unless you're just all talk for all your buddies down at the range.

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 11:08am
by Rat Patrol
JennyB wrote:
Flex wrote:It seems to me like if you're running for president, you probably shouldn't suggest your opponent be assassinated for their supreme court nominations.

Just one observer's opinion, is all.
I don't understand how he is getting away with this. Forget ideology right now, she's a former Secretary of State, senator, and First Lady. If this isn't an example of shouting fire in a crowded theater, I don't know what is.
I doubt the Justice Dept. sees any need to fan the flames any further since seriousness of the message would fly right over his head and the heads of every small-penised gun-stroker enthralled by him, but yes...what he just did is very much prosecutable if they chose to interpret it as a real threat.
18 U.S.C. ยง 879 : US Code - Section 879 wrote:Threats against former Presidents and certain other persons

(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully threatens to kill, kidnap, or inflict bodily harm upon - (1) a former President or a member of the immediate family of a former President; (2) a member of the immediate family of the President, the President-elect, the Vice President, or the Vice President-elect; (3) a major candidate for the office of President or Vice President, or a member of the immediate family of such candidate; or (4) a person protected by the Secret Service under section 3056(a)(6); shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. (b) As used in this section - (1) the term "immediate family" means - (A) with respect to subsection (a)(1) of this section, the wife of a former President during his lifetime, the widow of a former President until her death or remarriage, and minor children of a former President until they reach sixteen years of age; and (B) with respect to subsection (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section, a person to whom the President, President-elect, Vice President, Vice President-elect, or major candidate for the office of President or Vice President - (i) is related by blood, marriage, or adoption; or (ii) stands in loco parentis; (2) the term "major candidate for the office of President or Vice President" means a candidate referred to in subsection (a)(7) of section 3056 of this title; and (3) the terms "President-elect" and "Vice President-elect" have the meanings given those terms in section 871(b) of this title.

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 2:30pm
by tepista
Come on guys, he's just saying what other sociopaths are thinking.

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 10 Aug 2016, 3:43pm
by Dr. Medulla
tepista wrote:Come on guys, he's just saying what other sociopaths are thinking.
Image

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 23 Aug 2016, 6:32am
by Dr. Medulla
http://www.kmov.com/story/32807204/12-y ... n-colorado
Weston Imer: A name that screams, "My dad's a lawyer, you know!"

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 24 Aug 2016, 9:42am
by dpwolf
The Future of the Republican Party indeed.

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 01 Sep 2016, 11:50am
by Inder

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 12 Sep 2016, 10:59pm
by eumaas

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 14 Sep 2016, 7:46pm
by Rat Patrol

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 14 Sep 2016, 7:59pm
by Dr. Medulla
To be fair, he's among the least offensive Republicans running now.

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 15 Sep 2016, 9:32am
by JennyB
Dr. Medulla wrote:
To be fair, he's among the least offensive Republicans running now.
We elected (and I voted for) a dead senate candidate. But he was running against John Ashcroft, so he was infinitely better.

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 21 Sep 2016, 11:16am
by BostonBeaneater
Image

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 21 Sep 2016, 11:52am
by Dr. Medulla
The Haight in '67 didn't have as many weirdos as the GOP does in 2016.

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 21 Sep 2016, 12:04pm
by BostonBeaneater
Dr. Medulla wrote:The Haight in '67 didn't have as many weirdos as the GOP does in 2016.
Nazis, White Nationalists, Cult members, swindlers, slanderers, there is a seat at the table for all! *


*except for blacks, jews, and queers.

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Posted: 21 Sep 2016, 12:56pm
by Dr. Medulla
BostonBeaneater wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:The Haight in '67 didn't have as many weirdos as the GOP does in 2016.
Nazis, White Nationalists, Cult members, swindlers, slanderers, there is a seat at the table for all! *


*except for blacks, jews, and queers.
You missed perverts. Lots and lots of perverts.