The Future of the Republican Party

Politics and other such topical creams.
Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 90399
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Dr. Medulla »

The chickenshittery of these 2nd A people is well on display as they, predictably, deny any kind of violent intent behind the "joke." These are the same fuckers who weep about the flag and their pocket copy of the Constitution and how they're prepared to shed blood to defend both. They need all those guns because of tyranny and freedom and Jesus! C'mon, big boy, don't back off now because the issue's up front. Say that you're prepared to do it, unless you're just all talk for all your buddies down at the range.
Back off, or I'll blow the roof off—with sound!

Rat Patrol
User avatar
Unknown Immortal
Posts: 15431
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 9:23pm
Location: A flat burning junkheap for twenty square miles

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Rat Patrol »

JennyB wrote:
Flex wrote:It seems to me like if you're running for president, you probably shouldn't suggest your opponent be assassinated for their supreme court nominations.

Just one observer's opinion, is all.
I don't understand how he is getting away with this. Forget ideology right now, she's a former Secretary of State, senator, and First Lady. If this isn't an example of shouting fire in a crowded theater, I don't know what is.
I doubt the Justice Dept. sees any need to fan the flames any further since seriousness of the message would fly right over his head and the heads of every small-penised gun-stroker enthralled by him, but yes...what he just did is very much prosecutable if they chose to interpret it as a real threat.
18 U.S.C. § 879 : US Code - Section 879 wrote:Threats against former Presidents and certain other persons

(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully threatens to kill, kidnap, or inflict bodily harm upon - (1) a former President or a member of the immediate family of a former President; (2) a member of the immediate family of the President, the President-elect, the Vice President, or the Vice President-elect; (3) a major candidate for the office of President or Vice President, or a member of the immediate family of such candidate; or (4) a person protected by the Secret Service under section 3056(a)(6); shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. (b) As used in this section - (1) the term "immediate family" means - (A) with respect to subsection (a)(1) of this section, the wife of a former President during his lifetime, the widow of a former President until her death or remarriage, and minor children of a former President until they reach sixteen years of age; and (B) with respect to subsection (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section, a person to whom the President, President-elect, Vice President, Vice President-elect, or major candidate for the office of President or Vice President - (i) is related by blood, marriage, or adoption; or (ii) stands in loco parentis; (2) the term "major candidate for the office of President or Vice President" means a candidate referred to in subsection (a)(7) of section 3056 of this title; and (3) the terms "President-elect" and "Vice President-elect" have the meanings given those terms in section 871(b) of this title.

tepista
User avatar
Foul-Mouthed Werewolf
Posts: 35014
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 11:25am
Location: Livin on a fault line, Waiting on the big one

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by tepista »

Come on guys, he's just saying what other sociopaths are thinking.
We reach the parts other combos cannot reach
We beach the beachheads other armies cannot beach
We speak the tongues other mouths cannot speak

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 90399
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Dr. Medulla »

tepista wrote:Come on guys, he's just saying what other sociopaths are thinking.
Image
Back off, or I'll blow the roof off—with sound!

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 90399
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Dr. Medulla »

http://www.kmov.com/story/32807204/12-y ... n-colorado
Weston Imer: A name that screams, "My dad's a lawyer, you know!"
Back off, or I'll blow the roof off—with sound!

dpwolf
User avatar
Long Time Jerk
Posts: 594
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 11:07am

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by dpwolf »

The Future of the Republican Party indeed.
then don't go killing all the bees

Inder
User avatar
corecore vanguard
Posts: 9686
Joined: 14 Jun 2008, 3:28pm

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Inder »


eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23380
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: outer space

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by eumaas »

I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Rat Patrol
User avatar
Unknown Immortal
Posts: 15431
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 9:23pm
Location: A flat burning junkheap for twenty square miles

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Rat Patrol »


Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 90399
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Dr. Medulla »

To be fair, he's among the least offensive Republicans running now.
Back off, or I'll blow the roof off—with sound!

JennyB
User avatar
Clash Cuck
Posts: 19203
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 1:13pm
Location: Moranjortsville

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by JennyB »

Dr. Medulla wrote:
To be fair, he's among the least offensive Republicans running now.
We elected (and I voted for) a dead senate candidate. But he was running against John Ashcroft, so he was infinitely better.
Got a Rake? Sure!

IMCT: Inane Middle-Class Twats - Dr. M

Don't talk shop.

BostonBeaneater
User avatar
Autonomous Insect Cyborg Sentinel
Posts: 10547
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:24pm
Location: Between the moon and New York City

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by BostonBeaneater »

Image
Image

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 90399
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Dr. Medulla »

The Haight in '67 didn't have as many weirdos as the GOP does in 2016.
Back off, or I'll blow the roof off—with sound!

BostonBeaneater
User avatar
Autonomous Insect Cyborg Sentinel
Posts: 10547
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:24pm
Location: Between the moon and New York City

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by BostonBeaneater »

Dr. Medulla wrote:The Haight in '67 didn't have as many weirdos as the GOP does in 2016.
Nazis, White Nationalists, Cult members, swindlers, slanderers, there is a seat at the table for all! *


*except for blacks, jews, and queers.
Image

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 90399
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia

Re: The Future of the Republican Party

Post by Dr. Medulla »

BostonBeaneater wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:The Haight in '67 didn't have as many weirdos as the GOP does in 2016.
Nazis, White Nationalists, Cult members, swindlers, slanderers, there is a seat at the table for all! *


*except for blacks, jews, and queers.
You missed perverts. Lots and lots of perverts.
Back off, or I'll blow the roof off—with sound!

Post Reply