Free Julian Assange

[JennyB]

Sometimes i’m really proud about my country.
https://www.ansa.it/amp/english/news/20 ... 644ca.html

Your country? I was under the impression Naples was a city. Does the whole of Italy agree? If so then maybe you can be proud of your country.

I could never be proud of a country and I'm certain I'll never be proud of mine.

I could also never be proud of a rapist, but here we are (that was not aimed at you, Marky).

[Stefano1972]

we know how the mud machine of the so-called democratic West works.
When it is necessary to discredit someone, the most defamatory accusations are thrown at them, supported by a compliant media, to convince public opinion itself.
It wouldn't surprise me if those who accused Assange of rape were paid by some intelligence agency like the CIA or NSA.

[Marky Dread]

we know how the mud machine of the so-called democratic West works.
When it is necessary to discredit someone, the most defamatory accusations are thrown at them, supported by a compliant media, to convince public opinion itself.
It wouldn't surprise me if those who accused Assange of rape were paid by some intelligence agency like the CIA or NSA.

Thing is this doesn't help. Becuase if you dislike others thinking Assange is guilty when none of us know all the facts then all you are doing is speculating. Which is no different.

I have said previously in this thread that I think Assange is most likely guilty. But I have no more proof than you do of his innocence.

[Stefano1972]

we know how the mud machine of the so-called democratic West works.
When it is necessary to discredit someone, the most defamatory accusations are thrown at them, supported by a compliant media, to convince public opinion itself.
It wouldn't surprise me if those who accused Assange of rape were paid by some intelligence agency like the CIA or NSA.

Thing is this doesn't help. Becuase if you dislike others thinking Assange is guilty when none of us know all the facts then all you are doing is speculating. Which is no different.

I have said previously in this thread that I think Assange is most likely guilty. But I have no more proof than you do of his innocence.

I agree that no one has the truth in their pocket, whether to support a hypothesis or its exact opposite.
This should be explained to those who have already decided Assange is a rapist.
But the way intelligence agencies operate, I think we all know how it works. You just need to open a good history book to realize this.
I believe the list of lies constructed to convince public opinion to accept and take certain steps is already too long.

[Dr. Medulla]

Thing is this doesn't help. Becuase if you dislike others thinking Assange is guilty when none of us know all the facts then all you are doing is speculating. Which is no different.

I have said previously in this thread that I think Assange is most likely guilty. But I have no more proof than you do of his innocence.

Donald Trump can't be guilty of any of the huge list he's been accused/convicted of—it must be a conspiracy against him by the Deep State!

OJ couldn't have killed his wife and her friend—it must have been a conspiracy by the LAPD!

Jeffrey Epstein couldn't have killed himself—it must have been a conspiracy by Rich Asshole Pedos, Inc!

When a person defaults to a political thriller conspiracy—with no evidence to support it besides feelz—because they don't like the implication of the conventional explanation, they fail Occam's Razor badly.

[Marky Dread]

Thing is this doesn't help. Becuase if you dislike others thinking Assange is guilty when none of us know all the facts then all you are doing is speculating. Which is no different.

I have said previously in this thread that I think Assange is most likely guilty. But I have no more proof than you do of his innocence.

Donald Trump can't be guilty of any of the huge list he's been accused/convicted of—it must be a conspiracy against him by the Deep State!

OJ couldn't have killed his wife and her friend—it must have been a conspiracy by the LAPD!

Jeffrey Epstein couldn't have killed himself—it must have been a conspiracy by Rich Asshole Pedos, Inc!

When a person defaults to a political thriller conspiracy—with no evidence to support it besides feelz—because they don't like the implication of the conventional explanation, they fail Occam's Razor badly.

Doc you sure know some swell people.

[Dr. Medulla]

Thing is this doesn't help. Becuase if you dislike others thinking Assange is guilty when none of us know all the facts then all you are doing is speculating. Which is no different.

I have said previously in this thread that I think Assange is most likely guilty. But I have no more proof than you do of his innocence.

Donald Trump can't be guilty of any of the huge list he's been accused/convicted of—it must be a conspiracy against him by the Deep State!

OJ couldn't have killed his wife and her friend—it must have been a conspiracy by the LAPD!

Jeffrey Epstein couldn't have killed himself—it must have been a conspiracy by Rich Asshole Pedos, Inc!

When a person defaults to a political thriller conspiracy—with no evidence to support it besides feelz—because they don't like the implication of the conventional explanation, they fail Occam's Razor badly.

Doc you sure know some swell people.

I only get the Rich Asshole Pedos Inc newsletter for the crossword puzzle!

[Marky Dread]

Thing is this doesn't help. Becuase if you dislike others thinking Assange is guilty when none of us know all the facts then all you are doing is speculating. Which is no different.

I have said previously in this thread that I think Assange is most likely guilty. But I have no more proof than you do of his innocence.

Donald Trump can't be guilty of any of the huge list he's been accused/convicted of—it must be a conspiracy against him by the Deep State!

OJ couldn't have killed his wife and her friend—it must have been a conspiracy by the LAPD!

Jeffrey Epstein couldn't have killed himself—it must have been a conspiracy by Rich Asshole Pedos, Inc!

When a person defaults to a political thriller conspiracy—with no evidence to support it besides feelz—because they don't like the implication of the conventional explanation, they fail Occam's Razor badly.

Doc you sure know some swell people.

I only get the Rich Asshole Pedos Inc newsletter for the crossword puzzle!

Obviously. But can you finish it?

[Dr. Medulla]

Thing is this doesn't help. Becuase if you dislike others thinking Assange is guilty when none of us know all the facts then all you are doing is speculating. Which is no different.

I have said previously in this thread that I think Assange is most likely guilty. But I have no more proof than you do of his innocence.

Donald Trump can't be guilty of any of the huge list he's been accused/convicted of—it must be a conspiracy against him by the Deep State!

OJ couldn't have killed his wife and her friend—it must have been a conspiracy by the LAPD!

Jeffrey Epstein couldn't have killed himself—it must have been a conspiracy by Rich Asshole Pedos, Inc!

When a person defaults to a political thriller conspiracy—with no evidence to support it besides feelz—because they don't like the implication of the conventional explanation, they fail Occam's Razor badly.

Doc you sure know some swell people.

I only get the Rich Asshole Pedos Inc newsletter for the crossword puzzle!

Obviously. But can you finish it?

I always get stumped on the clues involving extradition treaties and consent laws.

[Marky Dread]

Donald Trump can't be guilty of any of the huge list he's been accused/convicted of—it must be a conspiracy against him by the Deep State!

OJ couldn't have killed his wife and her friend—it must have been a conspiracy by the LAPD!

Jeffrey Epstein couldn't have killed himself—it must have been a conspiracy by Rich Asshole Pedos, Inc!

When a person defaults to a political thriller conspiracy—with no evidence to support it besides feelz—because they don't like the implication of the conventional explanation, they fail Occam's Razor badly.

Doc you sure know some swell people.

I only get the Rich Asshole Pedos Inc newsletter for the crossword puzzle!

Obviously. But can you finish it?

I always get stumped on the clues involving extradition treaties and consent laws.

Yeah many find those tricky to navigate.

[Dr. Medulla]

Doc you sure know some swell people.

I only get the Rich Asshole Pedos Inc newsletter for the crossword puzzle!

Obviously. But can you finish it?

I always get stumped on the clues involving extradition treaties and consent laws.

Yeah many find those tricky to navigate.

You'd have to be a fucking prince to figure your way out!

[Stefano1972]

If we don't have evidence to confirm or deny the rape allegations against Assange, I think it's really pointless to talk about it.
What we know to be true, however, are Assange's accusations against the US government and the crimes committed by their army in Iraq, Afghanistan...
And that's the topic at hand.
What's the point of throwing it into a fuss like some are doing, I just can't understand what it's useful for. Perhaps to mask one's lack of knowledge on the subject?
In the latter case I remind you, you make a better impression by staying silent.

[Marky Dread]

I only get the Rich Asshole Pedos Inc newsletter for the crossword puzzle!

Obviously. But can you finish it?

I always get stumped on the clues involving extradition treaties and consent laws.

Yeah many find those tricky to navigate.

You'd have to be a fucking prince to figure your way out!

"a male member of a royal family". Sounds about right to me.

[Dr. Medulla]

Obviously. But can you finish it?

I always get stumped on the clues involving extradition treaties and consent laws.

Yeah many find those tricky to navigate.

You'd have to be a fucking prince to figure your way out!

"a male member of a royal family". Sounds about right to me.

Bingo.

[Silent Majority]

Thing is this doesn't help. Becuase if you dislike others thinking Assange is guilty when none of us know all the facts then all you are doing is speculating. Which is no different.

I have said previously in this thread that I think Assange is most likely guilty. But I have no more proof than you do of his innocence.

Donald Trump can't be guilty of any of the huge list he's been accused/convicted of—it must be a conspiracy against him by the Deep State!

OJ couldn't have killed his wife and her friend—it must have been a conspiracy by the LAPD!

Jeffrey Epstein couldn't have killed himself—it must have been a conspiracy by Rich Asshole Pedos, Inc!

When a person defaults to a political thriller conspiracy—with no evidence to support it besides feelz—because they don't like the implication of the conventional explanation, they fail Occam's Razor badly.

Doc you sure know some swell people.

I only get the Rich Asshole Pedos Inc newsletter for the crossword puzzle!

Heston gets it for the record reviews.