Free market?

Politics and other such topical creams.
Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116000
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: Free market?

Post by Dr. Medulla »

Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote: I think the burden of non-perky breast imagery is on the communicator, not the recipient.
Then you're siding with me on this? Because if my memory is correct—and when isn't it? :shifty: —my comment was in response to Tep saying something about boobs.
No, I am saying the exact opposite of you. When I hear anyone mention breasts, I default to perky, attractive ones in my head. It's up to them to describe them otherwise.

You on the other hand, would rather wait to be told you can enjoy visualizing breasts. That's just madness.
It's assumptions like yours that end up with you in unwanted tranny orgies.
NO. Stop right there. You know good and damn well that we are talking about breasts being described. And only that. And you are just wrong and clutching at straws.
Your vehemence suggests a repressed memory emerging. Played the Crying Game, have you?[/quote]

Stop projecting your fantasies on me and just fucking admit that being Canadian is more important to you than breasts.[/quote]

You're getting irrational. Would you like a roofie to perhaps send that memory back in the anxiety dungeon?
"I never doubted myself for a minute for I knew that my monkey-strong bowels were girded with strength, like the loins of a dragon ribboned with fat and the opulence of buffalo dung." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
Posts: 55432
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!

Re: Free market?

Post by Wolter »

Honestly, Hooks. You're arguing just to argue.
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23579
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: deep in your Id

Re: Free market?

Post by eumaas »

BostonBeaneater wrote:
eumaas wrote:I had a dream last night I was in Brazil with Teps and partying with a bunch of trannies. I shit you not. They kept trying to watch me shower, and I squealed like a child.
Thing is, I could see this happening. I'm pissed I wasn't invited.
It was a pretty sweet party. Lots of booze and cake. And I'm pretty sure my unconscious was just throwing up girls but adding dicks, so they looked passable.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116000
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: Free market?

Post by Dr. Medulla »

Wolter wrote:Honestly, Hooks. You're arguing just to argue.
Is that a violation of the club rules?

If I'm going to be mocked, I'm going to employ the right to mock (or something) back.
"I never doubted myself for a minute for I knew that my monkey-strong bowels were girded with strength, like the loins of a dragon ribboned with fat and the opulence of buffalo dung." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23579
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: deep in your Id

Re: Free market?

Post by eumaas »

Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:Honestly, Hooks. You're arguing just to argue.
Is that a violation of the club rules?

If I'm going to be mocked, I'm going to employ the right to mock (or something) back.
I see no Titzenmeineyes.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
Posts: 55432
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!

Re: Free market?

Post by Wolter »

eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:Honestly, Hooks. You're arguing just to argue.
Is that a violation of the club rules?

If I'm going to be mocked, I'm going to employ the right to mock (or something) back.
I see no Titzenmeineyes.
Yes, but your mocking is silly. It's like if I mocked Tep for being a stat nerd or eumaas for being a redneck. Whereas I am sensibly mocking you for being so Canadian that you won't commit to thinking about pert bosoms until someone provides proof of said pertness.
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23579
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: deep in your Id

Re: Free market?

Post by eumaas »

Wolter wrote:eumaas for being a redneck.
Exactly. I'm supposed to be mocked for being a filthy immigrant.
Image
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
Posts: 55432
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!

Re: Free market?

Post by Wolter »

Get a job, Feivel!
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116000
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: Free market?

Post by Dr. Medulla »

Wolter wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:Honestly, Hooks. You're arguing just to argue.
Is that a violation of the club rules?

If I'm going to be mocked, I'm going to employ the right to mock (or something) back.
I see no Titzenmeineyes.
Yes, but your mocking is silly. It's like if I mocked Tep for being a stat nerd or eumaas for being a redneck. Whereas I am sensibly mocking you for being so Canadian that you won't commit to thinking about pert bosoms until someone provides proof of said pertness.
That you default to a certain type only reflects your preference.

Are there all kinds of boobs? Yes. Big, small, pert, flabby, natural, augmented, old, young, female, male, and variations of all those.
Do all people prefer the same types of boobs? No. Any porn site will prove that.
Do some people find some types displeasing? Yes. Old flabby granny boobs or man boobs aren't appealing to me. Neither are massive fakes. But I'm pretty sure that gets some people hard or wet.
Can I read other people's minds? No. Not yet anyway.
So requesting clarification is wrong? Apparently.
"I never doubted myself for a minute for I knew that my monkey-strong bowels were girded with strength, like the loins of a dragon ribboned with fat and the opulence of buffalo dung." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23579
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: deep in your Id

Re: Free market?

Post by eumaas »

Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:Honestly, Hooks. You're arguing just to argue.
Is that a violation of the club rules?

If I'm going to be mocked, I'm going to employ the right to mock (or something) back.
I see no Titzenmeineyes.
Yes, but your mocking is silly. It's like if I mocked Tep for being a stat nerd or eumaas for being a redneck. Whereas I am sensibly mocking you for being so Canadian that you won't commit to thinking about pert bosoms until someone provides proof of said pertness.
That you default to a certain type only reflects your preference.

Are there all kinds of boobs? Yes. Big, small, pert, flabby, natural, augmented, old, young, female, male, and variations of all those.
Do all people prefer the same types of boobs? No. Any porn site will prove that.
Do some people find some types displeasing? Yes. Old flabby granny boobs or man boobs aren't appealing to me. Neither are massive fakes. But I'm pretty sure that gets some people hard or wet.
Can I read other people's minds? No. Not yet anyway.
So requesting clarification is wrong? Apparently.
The context was clear.

Communication is never wholly concrete and clear. Context, my man, context!
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
Posts: 55432
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!

Re: Free market?

Post by Wolter »

Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:Honestly, Hooks. You're arguing just to argue.
Is that a violation of the club rules?

If I'm going to be mocked, I'm going to employ the right to mock (or something) back.
I see no Titzenmeineyes.
Yes, but your mocking is silly. It's like if I mocked Tep for being a stat nerd or eumaas for being a redneck. Whereas I am sensibly mocking you for being so Canadian that you won't commit to thinking about pert bosoms until someone provides proof of said pertness.
That you default to a certain type only reflects your preference.

Are there all kinds of boobs? Yes. Big, small, pert, flabby, natural, augmented, old, young, female, male, and variations of all those.
Do all people prefer the same types of boobs? No. Any porn site will prove that.
Do some people find some types displeasing? Yes. Old flabby granny boobs or man boobs aren't appealing to me. Neither are massive fakes. But I'm pretty sure that gets some people hard or wet.
Can I read other people's minds? No. Not yet anyway.
So requesting clarification is wrong? Apparently.
Yes. yes it is wrong. Your brain should default to the most attractive breast type for you. That's normal, man.
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116000
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: Free market?

Post by Dr. Medulla »

Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote: Is that a violation of the club rules?

If I'm going to be mocked, I'm going to employ the right to mock (or something) back.
I see no Titzenmeineyes.
Yes, but your mocking is silly. It's like if I mocked Tep for being a stat nerd or eumaas for being a redneck. Whereas I am sensibly mocking you for being so Canadian that you won't commit to thinking about pert bosoms until someone provides proof of said pertness.
That you default to a certain type only reflects your preference.

Are there all kinds of boobs? Yes. Big, small, pert, flabby, natural, augmented, old, young, female, male, and variations of all those.
Do all people prefer the same types of boobs? No. Any porn site will prove that.
Do some people find some types displeasing? Yes. Old flabby granny boobs or man boobs aren't appealing to me. Neither are massive fakes. But I'm pretty sure that gets some people hard or wet.
Can I read other people's minds? No. Not yet anyway.
So requesting clarification is wrong? Apparently.
Yes. yes it is wrong. Your brain should default to the most attractive breast type for you. That's normal, man.
And you're saying it doesn't? There is a difference between what pops in my head immediately and whether I should assume that that's what the other person means.

Wolter: Hey, you like music?
Me (thinking): Yeah, Cocteau Twins make great music.
Me: Wow, you're a Cocteau Twins fan?
Wolter: What are you, a chimp?

Hence the clarification request.
"I never doubted myself for a minute for I knew that my monkey-strong bowels were girded with strength, like the loins of a dragon ribboned with fat and the opulence of buffalo dung." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23579
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: deep in your Id

Re: Free market?

Post by eumaas »

Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
eumaas wrote: I see no Titzenmeineyes.
Yes, but your mocking is silly. It's like if I mocked Tep for being a stat nerd or eumaas for being a redneck. Whereas I am sensibly mocking you for being so Canadian that you won't commit to thinking about pert bosoms until someone provides proof of said pertness.
That you default to a certain type only reflects your preference.

Are there all kinds of boobs? Yes. Big, small, pert, flabby, natural, augmented, old, young, female, male, and variations of all those.
Do all people prefer the same types of boobs? No. Any porn site will prove that.
Do some people find some types displeasing? Yes. Old flabby granny boobs or man boobs aren't appealing to me. Neither are massive fakes. But I'm pretty sure that gets some people hard or wet.
Can I read other people's minds? No. Not yet anyway.
So requesting clarification is wrong? Apparently.
Yes. yes it is wrong. Your brain should default to the most attractive breast type for you. That's normal, man.
And you're saying it doesn't? There is a difference between what pops in my head immediately and whether I should assume that that's what the other person means.

Wolter: Hey, you like music?
Me (thinking): Yeah, Cocteau Twins make great music.
Me: Wow, you're a Cocteau Twins fan?
Wolter: What are you, a chimp?

Hence the clarification request.
I think that's a weak analogy.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116000
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: Free market?

Post by Dr. Medulla »

eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote: Yes, but your mocking is silly. It's like if I mocked Tep for being a stat nerd or eumaas for being a redneck. Whereas I am sensibly mocking you for being so Canadian that you won't commit to thinking about pert bosoms until someone provides proof of said pertness.
That you default to a certain type only reflects your preference.

Are there all kinds of boobs? Yes. Big, small, pert, flabby, natural, augmented, old, young, female, male, and variations of all those.
Do all people prefer the same types of boobs? No. Any porn site will prove that.
Do some people find some types displeasing? Yes. Old flabby granny boobs or man boobs aren't appealing to me. Neither are massive fakes. But I'm pretty sure that gets some people hard or wet.
Can I read other people's minds? No. Not yet anyway.
So requesting clarification is wrong? Apparently.
Yes. yes it is wrong. Your brain should default to the most attractive breast type for you. That's normal, man.
And you're saying it doesn't? There is a difference between what pops in my head immediately and whether I should assume that that's what the other person means.

Wolter: Hey, you like music?
Me (thinking): Yeah, Cocteau Twins make great music.
Me: Wow, you're a Cocteau Twins fan?
Wolter: What are you, a chimp?

Hence the clarification request.
I think that's a weak analogy.
Change it to a genre. Me talking to a country music fan. He asks me if I like listening to music. I say yes, because I do. He puts it on the Inbred Music Network. I'm in hell.
"I never doubted myself for a minute for I knew that my monkey-strong bowels were girded with strength, like the loins of a dragon ribboned with fat and the opulence of buffalo dung." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23579
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: deep in your Id

Re: Free market?

Post by eumaas »

Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote: That you default to a certain type only reflects your preference.

Are there all kinds of boobs? Yes. Big, small, pert, flabby, natural, augmented, old, young, female, male, and variations of all those.
Do all people prefer the same types of boobs? No. Any porn site will prove that.
Do some people find some types displeasing? Yes. Old flabby granny boobs or man boobs aren't appealing to me. Neither are massive fakes. But I'm pretty sure that gets some people hard or wet.
Can I read other people's minds? No. Not yet anyway.
So requesting clarification is wrong? Apparently.
Yes. yes it is wrong. Your brain should default to the most attractive breast type for you. That's normal, man.
And you're saying it doesn't? There is a difference between what pops in my head immediately and whether I should assume that that's what the other person means.

Wolter: Hey, you like music?
Me (thinking): Yeah, Cocteau Twins make great music.
Me: Wow, you're a Cocteau Twins fan?
Wolter: What are you, a chimp?

Hence the clarification request.
I think that's a weak analogy.
Change it to a genre. Me talking to a country music fan. He asks me if I like listening to music. I say yes, because I do. He puts it on the Inbred Music Network. I'm in hell.
Ouch. That's really mean to country.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Post Reply