The Future of the Democratic Party

Politics and other such topical creams.
Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 71137
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 31 Jul 2017, 1:30pm

Flex wrote:
31 Jul 2017, 1:07pm


Honestly, there is actually a case to be made for supporting pro-life Dems occasionally. It's a Harry Reid situation: he was technically pro-life but the party position was so firm he consistently voted the pro-choice positions most/all of the time anyways. Poaching a few seats in red states with pro-life dems probably does more to protect female autonomy than jettisoning those seats to republicans. But there's, what, a few of these seats AT MOST in congress? Where the area is culturally conservative but economically liberal enough that a conservadem could win? That just doesn't seem to happen much anymore. Still, you could fund those folks on a case-by-case basis. but just say "the democratic party is the pro-choice party. the end" without jettisoning the commitment to the position at the highest levels. I mean, jesus christ.
Canada legalized same-sex marriage under Prime Minister Paul Martin, a Catholic who said that he was personally opposed to it based on his faith, but said that his job was not to enact his personal beliefs but to work with public opinion. There can be a distinction between a candidate's personal views and what they acknowledge to be their political obligations. Strict purity tests just doesn't result in intelligent and conscientious candidates. The anger from the left end of American politics risks producing the same kind of bozo candidates that the far right does. That's not advocating for centrism, but realizing that dogmatism isn't healthy in a pluralist society and/or system.
Walrus birth doesn't make good breakfast conversation!

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 25026
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by Flex » 31 Jul 2017, 1:45pm

Dr. Medulla wrote:
31 Jul 2017, 1:30pm
Canada legalized same-sex marriage under Prime Minister Paul Martin, a Catholic who said that he was personally opposed to it based on his faith, but said that his job was not to enact his personal beliefs but to work with public opinion. There can be a distinction between a candidate's personal views and what they acknowledge to be their political obligations. Strict purity tests just doesn't result in intelligent and conscientious candidates. The anger from the left end of American politics risks producing the same kind of bozo candidates that the far right does. That's not advocating for centrism, but realizing that dogmatism isn't healthy in a pluralist society and/or system.
Well, I think the reality is that Dem establishment does have purity tests it runs, it's just all on disallowing left economic positions. They obviously don't do purity tests on social issues. It's ironic that the socialist left gets lambasted by social progressives for being insufficiently woke on this stuff when it's the HillaryDems who sell out on these things every time.

The party - its platform, its non-elected leadership - should be consistent and unwavering on these issues in terms of what the party will stand for for its constituents and what it expects from its caucus. Which is why this "announcement" is deserving of scorn. Again, that doesn't rule out tactically supporting more conservative Dems in strategic areas, but it keeps the institution as a whole committed and less likely to bend on critical human rights issues. That's how to thread the needle between staying committed to just causes and not forcing purity tests where it doesn't make sense, imho.
"I live inside my own heart, Matt Damon." - Prince

Sous les pavés, la plage.

Pex Lives!

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 71137
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 31 Jul 2017, 2:09pm

Flex wrote:
31 Jul 2017, 1:45pm
Dr. Medulla wrote:
31 Jul 2017, 1:30pm
Canada legalized same-sex marriage under Prime Minister Paul Martin, a Catholic who said that he was personally opposed to it based on his faith, but said that his job was not to enact his personal beliefs but to work with public opinion. There can be a distinction between a candidate's personal views and what they acknowledge to be their political obligations. Strict purity tests just doesn't result in intelligent and conscientious candidates. The anger from the left end of American politics risks producing the same kind of bozo candidates that the far right does. That's not advocating for centrism, but realizing that dogmatism isn't healthy in a pluralist society and/or system.
Well, I think the reality is that Dem establishment does have purity tests it runs, it's just all on disallowing left economic positions. They obviously don't do purity tests on social issues. It's ironic that the socialist left gets lambasted by social progressives for being insufficiently woke on this stuff when it's the HillaryDems who sell out on these things every time.

The party - its platform, its non-elected leadership - should be consistent and unwavering on these issues in terms of what the party will stand for for its constituents and what it expects from its caucus. Which is why this "announcement" is deserving of scorn. Again, that doesn't rule out tactically supporting more conservative Dems in strategic areas, but it keeps the institution as a whole committed and less likely to bend on critical human rights issues. That's how to thread the needle between staying committed to just causes and not forcing purity tests where it doesn't make sense, imho.
And that's a problem that the Democrats are so dogmatic on economic policy, the ugly result of Bill Clinton's acceptance of Reagan. Of course any party is going to have basic positions on any number of issues, but it's much healthier for internal debate for a variety of views within those positions. It's clear how lethal it's been to the Republicans, especially as they keep moving the line of True Conservative farther and farther to the right. Democratic leadership is stuck in a mindset of keeping open its right flank while being dogmatic on its left. There's an irony that even as the Republicans are doing all they can to limit voting in structural ways, the Democrats are doing the same by limiting admission to their club.
Walrus birth doesn't make good breakfast conversation!

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 22600
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: Carrboro/Alamut

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by eumaas » 02 Aug 2017, 12:43pm

Was this pisted? Seems like the donors want to pull this crap again.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... r-hamptons
"The only thing that really occurs to me that I can say on this is to point out how fascinating it is that the Hassan-i-Sabbah archetype keeps turning up over and over again ... He disappears up into the mountains and is never seen again. Believe me, he'll never be seen again. He'll live forever because of that."

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 71137
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 02 Aug 2017, 1:16pm

eumaas wrote:
02 Aug 2017, 12:43pm
Was this pisted? Seems like the donors want to pull this crap again.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... r-hamptons
Just do away with the primaries and caucuses then. This is just the old boss system seeking to get around rank and file input.
Walrus birth doesn't make good breakfast conversation!

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 71137
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 10 Aug 2017, 6:40am

Walrus birth doesn't make good breakfast conversation!

eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 22600
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: Carrboro/Alamut

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by eumaas » 10 Aug 2017, 12:05pm

I've been skeptical of this russia shit since the start
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new ... -dnc-hack/
This is a weird article, though. Poorly written for one. Any thoughts?
"The only thing that really occurs to me that I can say on this is to point out how fascinating it is that the Hassan-i-Sabbah archetype keeps turning up over and over again ... He disappears up into the mountains and is never seen again. Believe me, he'll never be seen again. He'll live forever because of that."

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 71137
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 05 Sep 2017, 7:04am

Centrist think tank recommends centrism. Film at eleven.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/0 ... rty-242308
Walrus birth doesn't make good breakfast conversation!

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 71137
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 12 Sep 2017, 8:15pm

My god but she's cynical and duplicitous to be peddling such bullshit. If she'd won, it would have been understood it was because the Republicans nominated one of the most toxic candidates of all time. If anything, her win would have been tainted, not proof of perfection, because she hadn't beaten a serious opponent. What a loathsome wannabe she is.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... s-if-i-won
Walrus birth doesn't make good breakfast conversation!

revbob
User avatar
Unknown Immortal
Posts: 5291
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 12:31pm
Location: The Frozen Tundra
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by revbob » 13 Sep 2017, 12:47pm

Dr. Medulla wrote:
12 Sep 2017, 8:15pm
My god but she's cynical and duplicitous to be peddling such bullshit. If she'd won, it would have been understood it was because the Republicans nominated one of the most toxic candidates of all time. If anything, her win would have been tainted, not proof of perfection, because she hadn't beaten a serious opponent. What a loathsome wannabe she is.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... s-if-i-won
Shes trying to exonerate herself and shift the blame.

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 71137
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 13 Sep 2017, 12:56pm

revbob wrote:
13 Sep 2017, 12:47pm
Dr. Medulla wrote:
12 Sep 2017, 8:15pm
My god but she's cynical and duplicitous to be peddling such bullshit. If she'd won, it would have been understood it was because the Republicans nominated one of the most toxic candidates of all time. If anything, her win would have been tainted, not proof of perfection, because she hadn't beaten a serious opponent. What a loathsome wannabe she is.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... s-if-i-won
Shes trying to exonerate herself and shift the blame.
There was never any doubt. As long as there's a denial or lie handy, a Clinton will never resort to honesty.

Tom Frank's review of her account: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ar-message
Walrus birth doesn't make good breakfast conversation!

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 71137
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Nerdo Crombezia
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by Dr. Medulla » 10 Nov 2017, 12:14pm

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... run-report

Yes, the future must be an elderly pro-military centrist because all possibilities must be wretched.
Walrus birth doesn't make good breakfast conversation!

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 25026
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by Flex » 10 Nov 2017, 12:41pm

Dr. Medulla wrote:
10 Nov 2017, 12:14pm
Yes, the future must be an elderly pro-military centrist because all possibilities must be wretched.
hopefully he'll net someone some death pool points ahead of 2020
"I live inside my own heart, Matt Damon." - Prince

Sous les pavés, la plage.

Pex Lives!

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 25026
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!
Contact:

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by Flex » 16 Nov 2017, 1:31pm

so long, al.

Interesting to see some establishment electeds try to deflect, but the rank and file seems pretty ready to immediately cut bait. Just shows how totally connected to their base and for sure sincere dems establishment is with all the #believewomen stuff.
"I live inside my own heart, Matt Damon." - Prince

Sous les pavés, la plage.

Pex Lives!

JennyB
User avatar
Clash Cuck
Posts: 15383
Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 1:13pm
Location: Moranjortsville

Re: The Future of the Democratic Party

Post by JennyB » 16 Nov 2017, 1:33pm

Flex wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 1:31pm
so long, al.

Interesting to see some establishment electeds try to deflect, but the rank and file seems pretty ready to immediately cut bait. Just shows how totally connected to their base and for sure sincere dems establishment is with all the #believewomen stuff.
Yeah...the dems have, for the most part, been quick to call any of their guys out. Except for Clinton. Franken needs to resign.
Got a Rake? Sure!

IMCT: Inane Middle-Class Twats - Dr. M

Don't talk shop.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests