Re: That Will Israel For Humbug
Posted: 10 Sep 2017, 12:43pm
https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2017 ... nline.html
Yeah, about that "never again" stuff, Likudniks …
Yeah, about that "never again" stuff, Likudniks …
I wish that whole family would fall off the face of the earth. Except for their dog, because it's not his fault.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑10 Sep 2017, 12:43pmhttps://www.thestar.com/news/world/2017 ... nline.html
Yeah, about that "never again" stuff, Likudniks …
This doesn't happen, for the most part. I criticize Israel's policy all the time. I spent last evening watching the Super Bowl with two Israeli families and we spent a majority of the time criticizing Netanyahu, his coalition and his policies. However, when fellow Jews join the "pick me, pick me!" contingent and call for Israel's destruction, side with Hamas, etc, that's when the self-hating accusations begin. And I agree with those. Norm Finkelstein is a self-hating Jew. Ilan Pappe and Gilad Atzmon are self-hating Jews. I would never go so far as to say they are no longer Jewish, but they are pawns in a very dangerous tokenization game.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑11 Feb 2024, 11:25amI don't wish to be associated with that other bent banana of a thread, plus this one has a great title, so I'll post this here: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... of-history
I was quite taken with Neiman's book, Learning From the Germans—a friend of mine and a Holocaust scholar thinks her history is bad, but it's not my area so I can't really say—so I perk up when I see her name. But what is being argued about here, I think, rests on two distinct interpretations of the lesson of the Holocaust. One version is the danger of an all-powerful state turning its resources to persecute—to eliminate—a people. This is an interpretation that rests on the idea of a universal application. We can and should imagine ourselves as potential Jews (or Roma or Jehovah's Witnesses or any other group targeted for destruction by the Nazis) within or under our own state. The other version is that the lesson of the Holocaust is exclusively applicable to Jews, that it was the terrible logical endpoint of centuries of antisemitism, and so constant vigilance and especially action against perceived enemies of Jews is warranted. Do not hide, do not keep quiet—resist antisemites by all available means. That is, in essence, the state of Israel's position, particularly with events in Gaza. And it's that interpretation that leads Jewish critics of Israeli policy to potentially be labeled un-Jews or antisemites themselves.
I prefer the former version, in no small part because it does apply to me personally and I think it's a position that seeks to minimize state violence everywhere. Yet I would I don't reject the latter version because, well, I'm not Jewish and so I don't know that cultural trauma. It's not my place to deny it, even tho I think we can see that it can have horrible consequences.
The friend of mine I alluded to above runs a Jewish Studies program at a small school up here. He told me that one of his colleagues treated him very coldly because he maintained a polite relationship with another professor who supported the Palestinian cause (whatever that might mean—there's a whole range of possibilities there). He was taken aback and felt like his Jewishness had been questioned. I think running that program at this moment has been very stressful for him. If we were just teaching, he could better pick and choose who to interact with, but doing his job as an administrator has him feeling conflicted. Which is especially terrible because he wears his cultural identity quite openly (he's very much in the Woody Allen mode, minus all that gross Woody Allen stuff). I absolutely hate that he's got to chug thru all that.JennyB wrote: ↑12 Feb 2024, 11:59amThis doesn't happen, for the most part. I criticize Israel's policy all the time. I spent last evening watching the Super Bowl with two Israeli families and we spent a majority of the time criticizing Netanyahu, his coalition and his policies. However, when fellow Jews join the "pick me, pick me!" contingent and call for Israel's destruction, side with Hamas, etc, that's when the self-hating accusations begin. And I agree with those. Norm Finkelstein is a self-hating Jew. Ilan Pappe and Gilad Atzmon are self-hating Jews. I would never go so far as to say they are no longer Jewish, but they are pawns in a very dangerous tokenization game.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑11 Feb 2024, 11:25amI don't wish to be associated with that other bent banana of a thread, plus this one has a great title, so I'll post this here: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... of-history
I was quite taken with Neiman's book, Learning From the Germans—a friend of mine and a Holocaust scholar thinks her history is bad, but it's not my area so I can't really say—so I perk up when I see her name. But what is being argued about here, I think, rests on two distinct interpretations of the lesson of the Holocaust. One version is the danger of an all-powerful state turning its resources to persecute—to eliminate—a people. This is an interpretation that rests on the idea of a universal application. We can and should imagine ourselves as potential Jews (or Roma or Jehovah's Witnesses or any other group targeted for destruction by the Nazis) within or under our own state. The other version is that the lesson of the Holocaust is exclusively applicable to Jews, that it was the terrible logical endpoint of centuries of antisemitism, and so constant vigilance and especially action against perceived enemies of Jews is warranted. Do not hide, do not keep quiet—resist antisemites by all available means. That is, in essence, the state of Israel's position, particularly with events in Gaza. And it's that interpretation that leads Jewish critics of Israeli policy to potentially be labeled un-Jews or antisemites themselves.
I prefer the former version, in no small part because it does apply to me personally and I think it's a position that seeks to minimize state violence everywhere. Yet I would I don't reject the latter version because, well, I'm not Jewish and so I don't know that cultural trauma. It's not my place to deny it, even tho I think we can see that it can have horrible consequences.
And that's just it—the idea that Jews didn't learn their lesson rests on the idea that there is one certain correct lesson to be gained, that universalist interpretation. "Never again" is something that can be interpreted different ways and people are being unjustly smug in condemning Jews for not accepting the one they prefer. Any people who have gone thru a massive trauma like that, it ain't my place to assert what the correct lesson of their collective experience is.I don't think the lessons of the Holocaust is exclusively applicable to Jews. I do, however, really resent the implication that Israel, and Jews as a whole, did not "learn our lesson." Especially when it seems that Israel is the only country tasked to learn a lesson these days.
Can't it be both?Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Mar 2024, 11:09amIsraeli spy cows!
https://www.jns.org/israel-trained-catt ... -pa-daily/
Now, can they drive the Mossad vans or are they just passengers?
I wish I knew!JennyB wrote: ↑18 Mar 2024, 12:57pmCan't it be both?Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑18 Mar 2024, 11:09amIsraeli spy cows!
https://www.jns.org/israel-trained-catt ... -pa-daily/
Now, can they drive the Mossad vans or are they just passengers?