Page 125 of 129

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 14 Dec 2012, 8:32pm
by Dr. Medulla
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:i dont think you can trade a dude on the DL. is he on the 60 yet?
Is there even a DL during the off-season? Maybe, for 40-man purposes. Wasn't Carl Crawford traded to the Dodgers while on the DL?
Yeah. How did they do that? I object the trade.

I know you are allowed to PTNL a DL guy.
This suggests you can trade a guy on the DL. I would have sworn that you couldn't.
http://seattletimes.com/html/thehotston ... yes_y.html

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 14 Dec 2012, 8:41pm
by tepista
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:i dont think you can trade a dude on the DL. is he on the 60 yet?
Is there even a DL during the off-season? Maybe, for 40-man purposes. Wasn't Carl Crawford traded to the Dodgers while on the DL?
Yeah. How did they do that? I object the trade.

I know you are allowed to PTNL a DL guy.
This suggests you can trade a guy on the DL. I would have sworn that you couldn't.
http://seattletimes.com/html/thehotston ... yes_y.html
Shit, if Larry Stone says so, then shut the fuck up, everyone else.

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 14 Dec 2012, 8:55pm
by Dr. Medulla
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:i dont think you can trade a dude on the DL. is he on the 60 yet?
Is there even a DL during the off-season? Maybe, for 40-man purposes. Wasn't Carl Crawford traded to the Dodgers while on the DL?
Yeah. How did they do that? I object the trade.

I know you are allowed to PTNL a DL guy.
This suggests you can trade a guy on the DL. I would have sworn that you couldn't.
http://seattletimes.com/html/thehotston ... yes_y.html
Shit, if Larry Stone says so, then shut the fuck up, everyone else.
Larry Stone's forgotten more baseball than you'll ever know, Poindexter.

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 14 Dec 2012, 9:41pm
by tepista
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote: Is there even a DL during the off-season? Maybe, for 40-man purposes. Wasn't Carl Crawford traded to the Dodgers while on the DL?
Yeah. How did they do that? I object the trade.

I know you are allowed to PTNL a DL guy.
This suggests you can trade a guy on the DL. I would have sworn that you couldn't.
http://seattletimes.com/html/thehotston ... yes_y.html
Shit, if Larry Stone says so, then shut the fuck up, everyone else.
Larry Stone's forgotten more baseball than you'll ever know, Poindexter.
He's the Player To Be Named Larry

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 3:08pm
by Wolter
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Inder wrote:Cubs out on Sanchez, according to reports.
I'm pretty much never going to be excited about a Cub deal until the guy passes the physical.
Whomever is the "inside source" at Chicago is a fucking idiot. I know all the major twit-fucks have an inside guy at every team. This deal was "official" so was Haren for Marmol. Someone in that organization is a fucking loud mouth.
What's weird is that the Red Sox under Theo were generally pretty good about controlling leaks. What was leaked was normally done so at ownership's behest.
Dempster Braves Trade: Most likely leaked by the Braves
Marmol Haren Trade: Marmol leaked it himself, like a moron.
Annabelle Trade: Probably done by his agent to drive up the price Detroit was willing to pay.

So, I'm going to go ahead and say, while it has happened to the Cubs a lot lately, not really Theo's fault.

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 3:13pm
by Dr. Medulla
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Inder wrote:Cubs out on Sanchez, according to reports.
I'm pretty much never going to be excited about a Cub deal until the guy passes the physical.
Whomever is the "inside source" at Chicago is a fucking idiot. I know all the major twit-fucks have an inside guy at every team. This deal was "official" so was Haren for Marmol. Someone in that organization is a fucking loud mouth.
What's weird is that the Red Sox under Theo were generally pretty good about controlling leaks. What was leaked was normally done so at ownership's behest.
Dempster Braves Trade: Most likely leaked by the Braves
Marmol Haren Trade: Marmol leaked it himself, like a moron.
Annabelle Trade: Probably done by his agent to drive up the price Detroit was willing to pay.

So, I'm going to go ahead and say, while it has happened to the Cubs a lot lately, not really Theo's fault.
Image
:shifty:

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 3:23pm
by Wolter
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Wolter wrote: I'm pretty much never going to be excited about a Cub deal until the guy passes the physical.
Whomever is the "inside source" at Chicago is a fucking idiot. I know all the major twit-fucks have an inside guy at every team. This deal was "official" so was Haren for Marmol. Someone in that organization is a fucking loud mouth.
What's weird is that the Red Sox under Theo were generally pretty good about controlling leaks. What was leaked was normally done so at ownership's behest.
Dempster Braves Trade: Most likely leaked by the Braves
Marmol Haren Trade: Marmol leaked it himself, like a moron.
Annabelle Trade: Probably done by his agent to drive up the price Detroit was willing to pay.

So, I'm going to go ahead and say, while it has happened to the Cubs a lot lately, not really Theo's fault.
Image
:shifty:
Hell hath no fury like a twee lesbian folkie scorned.

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 3:42pm
by Dr. Medulla
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote: Whomever is the "inside source" at Chicago is a fucking idiot. I know all the major twit-fucks have an inside guy at every team. This deal was "official" so was Haren for Marmol. Someone in that organization is a fucking loud mouth.
What's weird is that the Red Sox under Theo were generally pretty good about controlling leaks. What was leaked was normally done so at ownership's behest.
Dempster Braves Trade: Most likely leaked by the Braves
Marmol Haren Trade: Marmol leaked it himself, like a moron.
Annabelle Trade: Probably done by his agent to drive up the price Detroit was willing to pay.

So, I'm going to go ahead and say, while it has happened to the Cubs a lot lately, not really Theo's fault.
Image
:shifty:
Hell hath no fury like a twee lesbian folkie scorned.
This is what poisoned kool-aid looks like:
Image

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 4:14pm
by Wolter
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote: What's weird is that the Red Sox under Theo were generally pretty good about controlling leaks. What was leaked was normally done so at ownership's behest.
Dempster Braves Trade: Most likely leaked by the Braves
Marmol Haren Trade: Marmol leaked it himself, like a moron.
Annabelle Trade: Probably done by his agent to drive up the price Detroit was willing to pay.

So, I'm going to go ahead and say, while it has happened to the Cubs a lot lately, not really Theo's fault.
Image
:shifty:
Hell hath no fury like a twee lesbian folkie scorned.
This is what poisoned kool-aid looks like:
Image
Thank goodness you're back on track now...

Image

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 4:42pm
by Dr. Medulla
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote: Dempster Braves Trade: Most likely leaked by the Braves
Marmol Haren Trade: Marmol leaked it himself, like a moron.
Annabelle Trade: Probably done by his agent to drive up the price Detroit was willing to pay.

So, I'm going to go ahead and say, while it has happened to the Cubs a lot lately, not really Theo's fault.
Image
:shifty:
Hell hath no fury like a twee lesbian folkie scorned.
This is what poisoned kool-aid looks like:
Image
Thank goodness you're back on track now...

Image
Do you think I'm not aware that I haven't yet woken up from the nightmare? :scared: God, 40% of the starts in the next two years …

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 17 Dec 2012, 5:36pm
by Inder
Not wanting to count chickens, but — Dickey, Johnson, Buehrle, Morrow, Romero, oh my!

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 17 Dec 2012, 5:45pm
by Dr. Medulla
Inder wrote:Not wanting to count chickens, but — Dickey, Johnson, Buehrle, Morrow, Romero, oh my!
Gonna suck horribly if you don't make the post-season. Just sayin' is all …

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 17 Dec 2012, 5:51pm
by Inder
I am optimistic of our chances.

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 17 Dec 2012, 6:12pm
by Rat Patrol
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Inder wrote:Not wanting to count chickens, but — Dickey, Johnson, Buehrle, Morrow, Romero, oh my!
Gonna suck horribly if you don't make the post-season. Just sayin' is all …
But think of how far under the luxury tax threshold they'll be when one of the LA teams swallows 7 of those contracts for a PTBNL at the deadline!

Re: MLB 2012

Posted: 17 Dec 2012, 6:20pm
by tepista
I didn't think there was a loser in the bunch when I thought of my preseason rotation last year. Ya gotta relieve and ya gotta hit.