So it's worth my thirty minutes to watch it when comes on the On-Demand channel thingee? Because I'll have you know that my time is valuable, dammit, and I require much laughter with my time.
The plot had a flaw, but I don't wanna spoil it. watch it first.
Re: Futurama
Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 5:23pm
by tepista
[v][/v]
Oh shit! This will probably grow legs and become a thing, like the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Re: Futurama
Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 5:24pm
by Dr. Medulla
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Kory wrote:Well, it was surprisingly good.
yes, agree
So it's worth my thirty minutes to watch it when comes on the On-Demand channel thingee? Because I'll have you know that my time is valuable, dammit, and I require much laughter with my time.
The plot had a flaw, but I don't wanna spoil it. watch it first.
Okay, I watched it. It was okay-ish. Too much forced referencing spoiled a potentially good story. It's like they had a checklist of all things and characters that had to be acknowledged.
Does your plot flaw involve another time travel episode?
Re: Futurama
Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 5:25pm
by tepista
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Kory wrote:Well, it was surprisingly good.
yes, agree
So it's worth my thirty minutes to watch it when comes on the On-Demand channel thingee? Because I'll have you know that my time is valuable, dammit, and I require much laughter with my time.
The plot had a flaw, but I don't wanna spoil it. watch it first.
Okay, I watched it. It was okay-ish. Too much forced referencing spoiled a potentially good story. It's like they had a checklist of all things and characters that had to be acknowledged.
Does your plot flaw involve another time travel episode?
Well, they came back to prevent the little Barts from ever existing, but they turned out to be as easy to kill as ants.
Re: Futurama
Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 5:32pm
by Dr. Medulla
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
yes, agree
So it's worth my thirty minutes to watch it when comes on the On-Demand channel thingee? Because I'll have you know that my time is valuable, dammit, and I require much laughter with my time.
The plot had a flaw, but I don't wanna spoil it. watch it first.
Okay, I watched it. It was okay-ish. Too much forced referencing spoiled a potentially good story. It's like they had a checklist of all things and characters that had to be acknowledged.
Does your plot flaw involve another time travel episode?
Well, they came back to prevent the little Barts from ever existing, but they turned out to be as easy to kill as ants.
I dunno, maybe they were harder to kill when they were bunnies? My plot flaw relates to Bender already being abandoned for a thousand years after the Roswell episode. And why was Seymour hanging out in front of a Springfield store instead of faithfully waiting in New York? (That's one of the dumb checklist references that I didn't like.)
Re: Futurama
Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 5:35pm
by tepista
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
So it's worth my thirty minutes to watch it when comes on the On-Demand channel thingee? Because I'll have you know that my time is valuable, dammit, and I require much laughter with my time.
The plot had a flaw, but I don't wanna spoil it. watch it first.
Okay, I watched it. It was okay-ish. Too much forced referencing spoiled a potentially good story. It's like they had a checklist of all things and characters that had to be acknowledged.
Does your plot flaw involve another time travel episode?
Well, they came back to prevent the little Barts from ever existing, but they turned out to be as easy to kill as ants.
I dunno, maybe they were harder to kill when they were bunnies? My plot flaw relates to Bender already being abandoned for a thousand years after the Roswell episode. And why was Seymour hanging out in front of a Springfield store instead of faithfully waiting in New York? (That's one of the dumb checklist references that I didn't like.)
Wife pointed that out as well.
Re: Futurama
Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 5:37pm
by Dr. Medulla
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
tepista wrote:
The plot had a flaw, but I don't wanna spoil it. watch it first.
Okay, I watched it. It was okay-ish. Too much forced referencing spoiled a potentially good story. It's like they had a checklist of all things and characters that had to be acknowledged.
Does your plot flaw involve another time travel episode?
Well, they came back to prevent the little Barts from ever existing, but they turned out to be as easy to kill as ants.
I dunno, maybe they were harder to kill when they were bunnies? My plot flaw relates to Bender already being abandoned for a thousand years after the Roswell episode. And why was Seymour hanging out in front of a Springfield store instead of faithfully waiting in New York? (That's one of the dumb checklist references that I didn't like.)
Wife pointed that out as well.
See, that's why we have baths.
Re: Futurama
Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 5:45pm
by tepista
I do like full circle jokes, so you're off the hook, this one time.
Re: Futurama
Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 5:52pm
by Dr. Medulla
Re: Futurama
Posted: 10 Nov 2014, 5:55pm
by tepista
tepista wrote:[v][/v]
Oh shit! This will probably grow legs and become a thing, like the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
But it has Dam Sandler AND Kevin Janes how could it not be good.
Re: Futurama
Posted: 03 Jun 2015, 10:36pm
by Flex
Burned through the entire series in the last few weeks. Had never gotten around to watching the last season and a half or so.Watched as a piece, it's actually really satisfying how well the revived seasons play next to the original run. I love all these characters so, so much. What a remarkable show. One of the best ever, really.
I still don't want to watch the crossover episode with the Simpsons, though.
Re: Futurama
Posted: 04 Jun 2015, 8:50am
by Wolter
Flex wrote:Burned through the entire series in the last few weeks. Had never gotten around to watching the last season and a half or so.Watched as a piece, it's actually really satisfying how well the revived seasons play next to the original run. I love all these characters so, so much. What a remarkable show. One of the best ever, really.
I still don't want to watch the crossover episode with the Simpsons, though.
I refuse to believe that is a thing that existed and will deny it even if shown proof.
Re: Futurama
Posted: 04 Jun 2015, 4:24pm
by Kory
Flex wrote:Burned through the entire series in the last few weeks. Had never gotten around to watching the last season and a half or so.Watched as a piece, it's actually really satisfying how well the revived seasons play next to the original run. I love all these characters so, so much. What a remarkable show. One of the best ever, really.
I still don't want to watch the crossover episode with the Simpsons, though.
I'll agree with this. I was a little disappointed during the original airing, but subsequent viewings has strengthened them.
