Page 9 of 16

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 26 Sep 2017, 12:27pm
by Dr. Medulla
BostonBeaneater wrote:
26 Sep 2017, 12:06pm
Yahoo Serious was a better Prime Minister than Paul Hogan.
This irritant was that country's greatest Minister of Culture.

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 26 Sep 2017, 12:37pm
by Silent Majority
BostonBeaneater wrote:
26 Sep 2017, 12:11pm
I wonder if Yahoo Serious will ever reform the Jam.

Image
They'll bury him a googliebob.

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 5:30pm
by Dr. Medulla
When the fuck did North Americans start using single quotes? Student after student for the last six years turn in stuff where, if they aren't quoting something directly, they use single quotes. Stuff like scare or snark quotes, they use singles. Who the hell is teaching them this? We fought or negotiated our way free of the Limeys to use double quotes, dagnabbit!

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 5:54pm
by Kory
Dr. Medulla wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:30pm
When the fuck did North Americans start using single quotes? Student after student for the last six years turn in stuff where, if they aren't quoting something directly, they use single quotes. Stuff like scare or snark quotes, they use singles. Who the hell is teaching them this? We fought or negotiated our way free of the Limeys to use double quotes, dagnabbit!
I do it sometimes when I'm feeling lazy. I guess that's all you need to know.

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 5:56pm
by Dr. Medulla
Kory wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:54pm
Dr. Medulla wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:30pm
When the fuck did North Americans start using single quotes? Student after student for the last six years turn in stuff where, if they aren't quoting something directly, they use single quotes. Stuff like scare or snark quotes, they use singles. Who the hell is teaching them this? We fought or negotiated our way free of the Limeys to use double quotes, dagnabbit!
I do it sometimes when I'm feeling lazy. I guess that's all you need to know.
I'm certain that someone or something is teaching these kids this Limey atrocity. And why is this the thing that they choose to learn?

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 6:21pm
by Rat Patrol
Dr. Medulla wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:56pm
Kory wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:54pm
Dr. Medulla wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:30pm
When the fuck did North Americans start using single quotes? Student after student for the last six years turn in stuff where, if they aren't quoting something directly, they use single quotes. Stuff like scare or snark quotes, they use singles. Who the hell is teaching them this? We fought or negotiated our way free of the Limeys to use double quotes, dagnabbit!
I do it sometimes when I'm feeling lazy. I guess that's all you need to know.
I'm certain that someone or something is teaching these kids this Limey atrocity. And why is this the thing that they choose to learn?
Just a theory...but if the apostrophe is easier to type on a phone than a quotation mark, they will double-down on the single-quote.

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 6:31pm
by Dr. Medulla
Rat Patrol wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 6:21pm
Dr. Medulla wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:56pm
Kory wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:54pm
Dr. Medulla wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:30pm
When the fuck did North Americans start using single quotes? Student after student for the last six years turn in stuff where, if they aren't quoting something directly, they use single quotes. Stuff like scare or snark quotes, they use singles. Who the hell is teaching them this? We fought or negotiated our way free of the Limeys to use double quotes, dagnabbit!
I do it sometimes when I'm feeling lazy. I guess that's all you need to know.
I'm certain that someone or something is teaching these kids this Limey atrocity. And why is this the thing that they choose to learn?
Just a theory...but if the apostrophe is easier to type on a phone than a quotation mark, they will double-down on the single-quote.
Ugh. That is so awful it makes sense. Still, they do know to use proper double quotes when quoting a source or historical figure, so maybe not.

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 6:43pm
by Inder
Dr. Medulla wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:30pm
When the fuck did North Americans start using single quotes? Student after student for the last six years turn in stuff where, if they aren't quoting something directly, they use single quotes. Stuff like scare or snark quotes, they use singles. Who the hell is teaching them this? We fought or negotiated our way free of the Limeys to use double quotes, dagnabbit!
I was surprised to learn it's standard in some newer/revised style guides.

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 6:50pm
by Rat Patrol
Inder wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 6:43pm
Dr. Medulla wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:30pm
When the fuck did North Americans start using single quotes? Student after student for the last six years turn in stuff where, if they aren't quoting something directly, they use single quotes. Stuff like scare or snark quotes, they use singles. Who the hell is teaching them this? We fought or negotiated our way free of the Limeys to use double quotes, dagnabbit!
I was surprised to learn it's standard in some newer/revised style guides.
Not in the style guides that you use if you actually want to get paid for your work.

Image


In my line of work, I can still legally give you 10 lashes for misuse of single quotes.

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 6:55pm
by Dr. Medulla
Rat Patrol wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 6:50pm
Inder wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 6:43pm
Dr. Medulla wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:30pm
When the fuck did North Americans start using single quotes? Student after student for the last six years turn in stuff where, if they aren't quoting something directly, they use single quotes. Stuff like scare or snark quotes, they use singles. Who the hell is teaching them this? We fought or negotiated our way free of the Limeys to use double quotes, dagnabbit!
I was surprised to learn it's standard in some newer/revised style guides.
Not in the style guides that you use if you actually want to get paid for your work.

Image


In my line of work, I can still legally give you 10 lashes for misuse of single quotes.
:lol: Aye and then some.

The missuz just informed me that a number of her colleagues (mis)use single quotes in the way I describe above. I don't recall any clients doing that, tho.

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 8:49pm
by Inder
Dr. Medulla wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 6:55pm
Rat Patrol wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 6:50pm
Inder wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 6:43pm
Dr. Medulla wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 5:30pm
When the fuck did North Americans start using single quotes? Student after student for the last six years turn in stuff where, if they aren't quoting something directly, they use single quotes. Stuff like scare or snark quotes, they use singles. Who the hell is teaching them this? We fought or negotiated our way free of the Limeys to use double quotes, dagnabbit!
I was surprised to learn it's standard in some newer/revised style guides.
Not in the style guides that you use if you actually want to get paid for your work.

Image


In my line of work, I can still legally give you 10 lashes for misuse of single quotes.
:lol: Aye and then some.

The missuz just informed me that a number of her colleagues (mis)use single quotes in the way I describe above. I don't recall any clients doing that, tho.
The MHRA, which is standard in the UK, requires single quotes.

Image

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 9:13pm
by Dr. Medulla
But that's the standard distinction between British rules and Canadian and American rules. I grew up knowing that in Canada we use double quotes for everything (except a quote within a quote). It's this recent, I guess distinction of quotation mark usage that I don't get. Quote JFK and they use doubles. Right. But for scare or snark quotes, where there's nobody actually being quoted—e.g., Trump is an ‘inspiring leader’—and they use singles. I have no idea where that's coming from.

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 27 Oct 2017, 9:16pm
by Inder
Ah yes. I think I misunderstood your point.

The obvious solution is go into your next lecture/seminar wearing these earrings:

Image

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 7:05am
by Dr. Medulla
Inder wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 9:16pm
Ah yes. I think I misunderstood your point.

The obvious solution is go into your next lecture/seminar wearing these earrings:

Image
It might put the Billy Corgan thing to the grave … :twitch:

Re: A Language Question For The Linguists

Posted: 28 Oct 2017, 9:16pm
by Marky Dread
Dr. Medulla wrote:
28 Oct 2017, 7:05am
Inder wrote:
27 Oct 2017, 9:16pm
Ah yes. I think I misunderstood your point.

The obvious solution is go into your next lecture/seminar wearing these earrings:

Image
It might put the Billy Corgan thing to the grave … :twitch:
Shouldn't Billy Corgan be in quotation marks? After all he is history"s biggest monster.