Page 1 of 34

The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 3:43pm
by Inder
Image

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 3:46pm
by Wolter
Solid.

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 3:49pm
by Dr. Medulla
IMCT has always been at war with SNews.

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 4:11pm
by tepista
is snews still around? i haven't visited in a long time

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 4:33pm
by Bankrobber
Inder wrote:Image
The dude needs less basball cap and more Black Flag t-shirt.

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 5:12pm
by JennyB
Is that Wolt or Gene? It has the hipster glasses, but it also has a beard.

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 5:28pm
by tepista
JennyB wrote:Is that Wolt or Gene? It has the hipster glasses, but it also has a beard.
It's the hybrid they dream of, Genathan Woltmaas.

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 5:29pm
by Dr. Medulla
tepista wrote:
JennyB wrote:Is that Wolt or Gene? It has the hipster glasses, but it also has a beard.
It's the hybrid they dream of, Genathan Woltmaas.
I think fantasize works better than dream.

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 5:30pm
by Wolter
tepista wrote:
JennyB wrote:Is that Wolt or Gene? It has the hipster glasses, but it also has a beard.
It's the hybrid they dream of, Genathan Woltmaas.
We're very dissappointed that he started wearing baseball caps.

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 6:59pm
by cretin
Wolter wrote:
tepista wrote:
JennyB wrote:Is that Wolt or Gene? It has the hipster glasses, but it also has a beard.
It's the hybrid they dream of, Genathan Woltmaas.
We're very dissappointed that he started wearing baseball caps.
FUCKER! Woltphin is beside himself!

Image

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 7:16pm
by Wolter
cretin wrote:
Wolter wrote:
tepista wrote:
JennyB wrote:Is that Wolt or Gene? It has the hipster glasses, but it also has a beard.
It's the hybrid they dream of, Genathan Woltmaas.
We're very dissappointed that he started wearing baseball caps.
FUCKER! Woltphin is beside himself!

Image
:(

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 12 Jul 2010, 8:58pm
by cretin
Wolter wrote:
cretin wrote:
Wolter wrote:
tepista wrote:
JennyB wrote:Is that Wolt or Gene? It has the hipster glasses, but it also has a beard.
It's the hybrid they dream of, Genathan Woltmaas.
We're very dissappointed that he started wearing baseball caps.
FUCKER! Woltphin is beside himself!

Image
:(
Hey, you did it.

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 13 Jul 2010, 8:53am
by Spiff
Starfish-Woltphin love is the forbidden love.

Summer 2010 Rare Planetary Alignments

Posted: 13 Jul 2010, 9:19am
by BostonBeaneater
FYI:

View of the solar system on August 1st, 2010, 6AM
http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Solar

Summer 2010 Galactic Alignments

June 13th, 2010Author:Light-admin

There are two powerful transformative Galactic planetary alignments in the
summer of 2010.

The alignment of planets will appear from Earth like a straight line of six
planets with the sun in the middle; Uranus, Jupiter and Mercury lined up on one
side of the sun, while Venus, Mars and Saturn will be lined up on the opposite.
The Earth will thus be perpendicular to this alignment, forming a giant T-shape.

The Cardinal Cross, this event hasn’t happened in the past 5,000+ years.

A T-Cross on July 30 of six planets — the Moon, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus
and Pluto — all forming a very “difficult” and “stressful” set of oppositions in
the cardinal signs of Aries, Libra and Capricorn.

A Cardinal Grand Cross on August 6 of seven planets as Venus joins the
alignment, and the Moon moves into Cancer.

The alignment suggests a death-rebirth sequence.



"For years, astrologers have been predicting sweeping global change in 2010 and
2011, based on a shift in planetary alignment into the cardinal signs.

The signs of the zodiac are divided into three qualities, or “quadrulplicites.”
The cardinal signs — Aries, Cancer, Libra, and Capricorn — are dynamic and
initiate action. The fixed signs — Taurus, Leo, Scorpio, and Aquarius — are
persistent and, just as the name suggests, solid and unmoving. The mutable signs
— Gemini, Virgo, Sagittarius, and Pisces — are adaptable, flexible, and open to
change.

A T-square occurs when planets occupy three signs within one quality. Put
another way, it is comprised of two squares (90 degrees) and an opposition (180
degrees), which denotes extreme tension and conflict. The planet or planets at
the point, or apex, take on great significance. If all four signs are occupied,
then it’s called a grand cross, which is comprised of four squares and two
oppositions.

Such alignments are rare, and when they happen, dramatic events take place on
the world stage. That will be all the more true in 2010, because the eclipses in
Capricorn and Cancer are part of the picture. Eclipses are often enough on their
own to herald life-changing events.
From late July to mid-August of 2010, there will be a tight T-square involving
Venus, Mars, Saturn, Jupiter, Uranus and Pluto. We’ll have a few days in there
when the Moon in Cancer transforms the configuration into a grand cross."

The Grand Cross is a powerful alignment that creates resistance that erupts into
conflict and, ultimately, resolution. Our resistance to change will be revealed
under these influences and we will have to let go in order to ride the wave into
a new future.

-->On August 1, give or take a week, we’ll have the most five-planet alignments
in perhaps thousands of years. Known as the “Cardinal Climax,” this is the
meanest, nastiest, most challenging and most transformational of any planetary
phenomena in all of written history!

This is the view of the planets from New York City on Aug. 1, at 6am. We have
the most planets in the tightest alignments and at the supposedly 'sensitive'
Zero degrees of Cardinal signs. It makes the hair on the back of my neck stand
up.

I looked at records going back to the 1800’s, and this is the most difficult
alignment I found. When I was at a conference in Boston last month, someone said
this was the most difficult alignment they have seen in the last "1,000 years."
Another person told me this is the worst alignment in "10,000 years."

What are possible consequences?

Worst cases include a nuclear accident. Nuclear war. Massive societal collapse.
Maybe a pole flip, which can wipe out nearly everything.

[http://seekingalpha.com/author/hewitt-h ... /instablog]

Re: The IMCT observations thread

Posted: 14 Jul 2010, 9:51am
by Olaf
Inder wrote:Image
"KAMPF!"