Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
- tepista
- Foul-Mouthed Werewolf
- Posts: 37872
- Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 11:25am
- Location: Livin on a fault line, Waiting on the big one
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
hey, i watched Back to School drunk yesterday
We reach the parts other combos cannot reach
We beach the beachheads other armies cannot beach
We speak the tongues other mouths cannot speak
We beach the beachheads other armies cannot beach
We speak the tongues other mouths cannot speak
- BostonBeaneater
- Autonomous Insect Cyborg Sentinel
- Posts: 11944
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:24pm
- Location: Between the moon and New York City
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
tepista wrote:hey, i watched Back to School drunk yesterday
Fine film. I like Kurt Vonnegut's cameo.
-
Silent Majority
- Singer-Songwriter Nancy
- Posts: 18702
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 8:28pm
- Location: South Londoner in the Midlands.
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
Think I'll watch it tomorrow.BostonBeaneater wrote:tepista wrote:hey, i watched Back to School drunk yesterday
Fine film. I like Kurt Vonnegut's cameo.
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116017
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
Had my first class of the year (US, 1865–1945) and afterwards had a student say that he never expected to have an instructor wearing a Swans shirt. I told him he was probably right. My god, tho, after an hour my voice was croaking, let alone the upcoming 3 hour lectures. I'm going to have to be sucking on lozenges while talking or else I'll be Harvey Fierstein.
"Wandering through starry skies and when tomorrow's day arrives, I'll be a morning closer to the brightest hour here with you. One step closer, getting brighter. One step closer, getting brighter." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
I got your back.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑13 Jan 2017, 8:32pmHad my first class of the year (US, 1865–1945) and afterwards had a student say that he never expected to have an instructor wearing a Swans shirt. I told him he was probably right. My god, tho, after an hour my voice was croaking, let alone the upcoming 3 hour lectures. I'm going to have to be sucking on lozenges while talking or else I'll be Harvey Fierstein.
http://www.stuffyoushouldknow.com/blogs ... -films.htm
https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLd ... _md4oOjc6K
http://www.artofmanliness.com/2013/01/2 ... -watching/
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116017
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
Heh, I watched a number of those for my diss research. Premise behind every mental hygiene flick: teenagers are idiots, maybe even self-destructively so. Let experts socialize them before it's too late.revbob wrote: ↑14 Jan 2017, 6:14pmI got your back.
http://www.stuffyoushouldknow.com/blogs ... -films.htm
https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLd ... _md4oOjc6K
http://www.artofmanliness.com/2013/01/2 ... -watching/
"Wandering through starry skies and when tomorrow's day arrives, I'll be a morning closer to the brightest hour here with you. One step closer, getting brighter. One step closer, getting brighter." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
I can't imagine how you do a 3 hour lecture though. A pretty interesting period of history you have there. Lots of parallels to what's happening now.
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116017
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
When I was writing lectures this summer, the parallels popped up plenty of times. The election of 1896, between big business and populism, comes to mind, tho in that case the populists lost. And the 1920s, which was a period of retrenched nativism and looting of the public treasury by Republican administrations.
My former supervisor, who teaches the 1945 to present course, which is, weirdly, scheduled in the term before mine, said she had a number of snarling Trumpists in her class. I'm intrigued whether I'll get any of them and how they'll respond cos my lectures don't shy away from racism and sexism.
"Wandering through starry skies and when tomorrow's day arrives, I'll be a morning closer to the brightest hour here with you. One step closer, getting brighter. One step closer, getting brighter." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
I was also thinking (and this is yet to fully play out) of the corruption/cronyism of the Grant administration and what we're seeing with Trump.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑14 Jan 2017, 8:12pmWhen I was writing lectures this summer, the parallels popped up plenty of times. The election of 1896, between big business and populism, comes to mind, tho in that case the populists lost. And the 1920s, which was a period of retrenched nativism and looting of the public treasury by Republican administrations.
My former supervisor, who teaches the 1945 to present course, which is, weirdly, scheduled in the term before mine, said she had a number of snarling Trumpists in her class. I'm intrigued whether I'll get any of them and how they'll respond cos my lectures don't shy away from racism and sexism.
Why the fuck are there Trumpists in Canada? Are these students from the US studying in Canada?
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116017
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
The other day I told my sister that the Harding administration will be the reference point to gleeful corruption that the Trump gang will be bringing. A bunch of goons with zero interest or ability in public administration and a belief that getting rich anyway possible is a virtue.revbob wrote: ↑14 Jan 2017, 9:24pmI was also thinking (and this is yet to fully play out) of the corruption/cronyism of the Grant administration and what we're seeing with Trump.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑14 Jan 2017, 8:12pmWhen I was writing lectures this summer, the parallels popped up plenty of times. The election of 1896, between big business and populism, comes to mind, tho in that case the populists lost. And the 1920s, which was a period of retrenched nativism and looting of the public treasury by Republican administrations.
My former supervisor, who teaches the 1945 to present course, which is, weirdly, scheduled in the term before mine, said she had a number of snarling Trumpists in her class. I'm intrigued whether I'll get any of them and how they'll respond cos my lectures don't shy away from racism and sexism.
There are some American students up here, but we have plenty of nativist whites up here, too. The federal Conservatives are in the midst of a leadership campaign right now and one nitwit is trying to replicate Trump's strategy. Whether it's a difference in the two nations' political culture or her poor huckstering skills, she doesn't seem likely to win (a doctor who proudly decries the elites). But, trust me, we have no shortage of people who respond to "Canadian values" (read: white) dog whistles. I hope to Christ that the social democrats up here are smart enough to shift populist left and not just leave that mood to the right.Why the fuck are there Trumpists in Canada? Are these students from the US studying in Canada?
"Wandering through starry skies and when tomorrow's day arrives, I'll be a morning closer to the brightest hour here with you. One step closer, getting brighter. One step closer, getting brighter." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
I've been seeing a lot of people from the UK posting pro-Trump stuff online as well. They think he's going to change the world for the better.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑14 Jan 2017, 9:55pmThe other day I told my sister that the Harding administration will be the reference point to gleeful corruption that the Trump gang will be bringing. A bunch of goons with zero interest or ability in public administration and a belief that getting rich anyway possible is a virtue.revbob wrote: ↑14 Jan 2017, 9:24pmI was also thinking (and this is yet to fully play out) of the corruption/cronyism of the Grant administration and what we're seeing with Trump.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑14 Jan 2017, 8:12pmWhen I was writing lectures this summer, the parallels popped up plenty of times. The election of 1896, between big business and populism, comes to mind, tho in that case the populists lost. And the 1920s, which was a period of retrenched nativism and looting of the public treasury by Republican administrations.
My former supervisor, who teaches the 1945 to present course, which is, weirdly, scheduled in the term before mine, said she had a number of snarling Trumpists in her class. I'm intrigued whether I'll get any of them and how they'll respond cos my lectures don't shy away from racism and sexism.
There are some American students up here, but we have plenty of nativist whites up here, too. The federal Conservatives are in the midst of a leadership campaign right now and one nitwit is trying to replicate Trump's strategy. Whether it's a difference in the two nations' political culture or her poor huckstering skills, she doesn't seem likely to win (a doctor who proudly decries the elites). But, trust me, we have no shortage of people who respond to "Canadian values" (read: white) dog whistles. I hope to Christ that the social democrats up here are smart enough to shift populist left and not just leave that mood to the right.Why the fuck are there Trumpists in Canada? Are these students from the US studying in Canada?
"Suck our Earth dick, Martians!" —Doc
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116017
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
Tonight's lecture is on industrialization, presenting students with the choice of interpreting in favour of technological development and immense wealth creation or economic stratification and loss of workplace autonomy. I'll be making the case for both, but I'm curious how many want to speak up one way or another.
"Wandering through starry skies and when tomorrow's day arrives, I'll be a morning closer to the brightest hour here with you. One step closer, getting brighter. One step closer, getting brighter." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
So how are these Friday night classes going? I've never known a school to have Friday evening classes. Most times the profs are looking to get the weekend started as much as the students.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑27 Jan 2017, 4:46pmTonight's lecture is on industrialization, presenting students with the choice of interpreting in favour of technological development and immense wealth creation or economic stratification and loss of workplace autonomy. I'll be making the case for both, but I'm curious how many want to speak up one way or another.
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116017
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
And, indeed, there's no tenured prof willing to teach in that shitty timeslot. My dept head told me last week that she's used me to shame the complainers in the dept. But then I'm just a sessional—my room to complain is pretty narrrow.
This is the first school I've been in that had Friday evening classes. Crazy awful. And, yeah, attendance is already around 60% of enrolment. I knew that would happen, tho, and expect it to drop again come March, when assignments in other courses mount. Three-hour lectures are wretched; Friday night is insult to injury. My lecture last night kinda collapsed in the second half and it was my own fault. I was trying to convey the diversity of urban life and thought in the late 19th century, but I ended up overloading them with too many facets, which came off—at least to me as I was talking—as one goddamned thing after another. Not enough focus. Oh well, it happens. In a couple weeks, I get to the 20th c, and then stuff will get a lot more comfortable for me to talk about. Still, if you can reach 10% of the class, be happy with that, and I've got about 15% based on those who want to talk after class. So, based on that standard, it's going well enough.
"Wandering through starry skies and when tomorrow's day arrives, I'll be a morning closer to the brightest hour here with you. One step closer, getting brighter. One step closer, getting brighter." - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School
If you're getting that many who want to chat after class then it sounds like you're doing well. I'd love to take your classes but I hate writing papers that's partly what pushed me into math and science.Dr. Medulla wrote: ↑04 Feb 2017, 1:43pmAnd, indeed, there's no tenured prof willing to teach in that shitty timeslot. My dept head told me last week that she's used me to shame the complainers in the dept. But then I'm just a sessional—my room to complain is pretty narrrow.
This is the first school I've been in that had Friday evening classes. Crazy awful. And, yeah, attendance is already around 60% of enrolment. I knew that would happen, tho, and expect it to drop again come March, when assignments in other courses mount. Three-hour lectures are wretched; Friday night is insult to injury. My lecture last night kinda collapsed in the second half and it was my own fault. I was trying to convey the diversity of urban life and thought in the late 19th century, but I ended up overloading them with too many facets, which came off—at least to me as I was talking—as one goddamned thing after another. Not enough focus. Oh well, it happens. In a couple weeks, I get to the 20th c, and then stuff will get a lot more comfortable for me to talk about. Still, if you can reach 10% of the class, be happy with that, and I've got about 15% based on those who want to talk after class. So, based on that standard, it's going well enough.