Page 4 of 10

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:17pm
by rcs
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:I don't get it.
Meaning you find her unappealing—the Hoyish stance—or you don't know who she is?
the latter

i don't find her appealling, nor unappealling.... very middlin'...

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:19pm
by rcs
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Especially on a day when he found Ann Coulter appealing.
that's our hoy.... :disshame:

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:20pm
by Flex
rcs wrote:i don't find her appealling, nor unappealling.... very middlin'...
She's the Russian spy they've been talkin' about of late.

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:21pm
by Dr. Medulla
rcs wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:I don't get it.
Meaning you find her unappealing—the Hoyish stance—or you don't know who she is?
the latter
Anna Chapman, arrested as a Russian spy.

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:28pm
by rcs
Dr. Medulla wrote:
rcs wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:I don't get it.
Meaning you find her unappealing—the Hoyish stance—or you don't know who she is?
the latter
Anna Chapman, arrested as a Russian spy.
she's no Mati Hari :shifty:

or Ethel Rosenberg :shifty:

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:31pm
by Silent Majority
rcs wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
rcs wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:I don't get it.
Meaning you find her unappealing—the Hoyish stance—or you don't know who she is?
the latter
Anna Chapman, arrested as a Russian spy.
she's no Mati Hari :shifty:

or Ethel Rosenberg :shifty:
I'm not going to lie, rcs, I have no idea who those people are. And I'm afraid if you tell me, it'll use up the remaining space for useless information in my brain and I'll forget Jack Nicholson's films for Roger Corman. Or my body will have become useless information dependent, and instead start shutting down on energy using essentials like converting carbon into energy or fighting viruses in order to keep all the Power Rangers' first names in my head.

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:43pm
by matedog
rcs wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
Especially on a day when he found Ann Coulter appealing.
that's our hoy.... :disshame:
Come on, don't tell me you've never wanted to do an ugly chick for the very fact that she's got one of those "I'm ugly, do me" faces?

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:44pm
by eumaas
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:I saw photos of her in the news and didn't think to make any comment about them until you decided it was some kind of Hoy issue.
Um, you commented immediately after I posted it.
Ahem.

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:45pm
by eumaas
And I do think she's ugly. I seem to recall plenty here suggesting other people were ugly, though, so I'm not sure how I've become the villain.

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:53pm
by eumaas
Incidentally, my original "I don't get it" was over the photos all put together like that. I thought there was some detail I was missing--like she had changed from one to the other.

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:57pm
by Wolter
I don't find her particularly attractive. Ugly is kind of harsh, but she ain't that pretty, neither.

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 6:59pm
by eumaas
Wolter wrote:I don't find her particularly attractive. Ugly is kind of harsh, but she ain't that pretty, neither.
She's not hideous, but I don't find her pleasant to look at or even plain. The proportions are strange as hell to me--I'm not sure I've seen a person with that small a mouth and chin in ratio to the length of the nose and prominence of the cheeks before.

Maybe all right in person, though--sometimes photos just ruin people.

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 7:02pm
by matedog
I was watching this, um, movie two days ago. And instead of pulling one off to the more attractive chicks I went for the ugly, slutty looking one. Not out of pity, but sometimes I just want to imagine giving a nasty skank a go.

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 7:05pm
by Dr. Medulla
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:I saw photos of her in the news and didn't think to make any comment about them until you decided it was some kind of Hoy issue.
Um, you commented immediately after I posted it.
Ahem.
My apologies for calling you out in not mentioning you by name. :huh:

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Posted: 08 Jul 2010, 7:07pm
by Wolter
matedog wrote:I was watching this, um, movie two days ago. And instead of pulling one off to the more attractive chicks I went for the ugly, slutty looking one. Not out of pity, but sometimes I just want to imagine giving a nasty skank a go.
So...you didn't MASTURBATE out of pity? Good. I'd hate for a porn star to get just a pity wank from you.