for the eyes of Matedog only

General music discussion.
Post Reply
eumaas
User avatar
Klezmer Shogun
Posts: 23579
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 8:10pm
Location: deep in your Id

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by eumaas »

Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:I saw photos of her in the news and didn't think to make any comment about them until you decided it was some kind of Hoy issue.
Um, you commented immediately after I posted it.
Ahem.
My apologies for calling you out in not mentioning you by name. :huh:
Oy. I don't know how to make this clearer. What I'm saying is I saw her over and over again in the news for however long it's been a story, and her ugliness was not enough of note for me to post about it. It's only because her purported beauty has been raised as an issue that I've responded with dissent (although my initial response was just confusion). I don't see why I deserve censure for voicing an opinion on an issue that's been raised.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman

I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 35924
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Flex »

matedog wrote:I was watching this, um, movie two days ago. And instead of pulling one off to the more attractive chicks I went for the ugly, slutty looking one. Not out of pity, but sometimes I just want to imagine giving a nasty skank a go.
This is... something.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead

Pex Lives!

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
Posts: 55432
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Wolter »

The important thing to remember: Black Widow she is not.
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

Heston
User avatar
God of Thunder...and Rock 'n Roll
Posts: 38367
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 4:07pm
Location: North of Watford Junction

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Heston »

Everyone's avoiding the BIG question: Does she smell of vegetable soup?
There's a tiny, tiny hopeful part of me that says you guys are running a Kaufmanesque long con on the board

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
Posts: 55432
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Wolter »

Heston wrote:Everyone's avoiding the BIG question: Does she smell of vegetable soup?
She's a Russian spy. So stale sweat and borscht.
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

matedog
User avatar
Purveyor of Hoyistic Thought
Posts: 25855
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 4:07pm
Location: 1995

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by matedog »

Wolter wrote:
matedog wrote:I was watching this, um, movie two days ago. And instead of pulling one off to the more attractive chicks I went for the ugly, slutty looking one. Not out of pity, but sometimes I just want to imagine giving a nasty skank a go.
So...you didn't MASTURBATE out of pity? Good. I'd hate for a porn star to get just a pity wank from you.
Come on, everyone's done that at least a few times.
Look, you have to establish context for these things. And I maintain that unless you appreciate the Fall of Constantinople, the Great Fire of London, and Mickey Mantle's fatalist alcoholism, live Freddy makes no sense. If you want to half-ass it, fine, go call Simon Schama to do the appendix.

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 35924
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Flex »

matedog wrote:Come on, everyone's done that at least a few times.
I can not once remember masturbating out of pity.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead

Pex Lives!

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
Posts: 55432
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Wolter »

Flex wrote:
matedog wrote:Come on, everyone's done that at least a few times.
I can not once remember masturbating out of pity.
The concept doesn't even make sense. "I feel bad for this less attractive porn star. I guess I'll pretend to fuck her instead. That will make her feel pretty."
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116489
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Dr. Medulla »

eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:I saw photos of her in the news and didn't think to make any comment about them until you decided it was some kind of Hoy issue.
Um, you commented immediately after I posted it.
Ahem.
My apologies for calling you out in not mentioning you by name. :huh:
Oy. I don't know how to make this clearer. What I'm saying is I saw her over and over again in the news for however long it's been a story, and her ugliness was not enough of note for me to post about it. It's only because her purported beauty has been raised as an issue that I've responded with dissent (although my initial response was just confusion). I don't see why I deserve censure for voicing an opinion on an issue that's been raised.
Who the hell is being censured? Jesus Christ, man, we disagree, particularly over what I regard as an excessive dissection of her face that makes her out as quite ugly. Fine, I'll add female beauty to the list of topics that I'm not allowed to disagree with or tease you about.
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

Heston
User avatar
God of Thunder...and Rock 'n Roll
Posts: 38367
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 4:07pm
Location: North of Watford Junction

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Heston »

I've found with porn stars it's the uglier the better.
There's a tiny, tiny hopeful part of me that says you guys are running a Kaufmanesque long con on the board

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
Posts: 55432
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Wolter »

Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote: Um, you commented immediately after I posted it.
Ahem.
My apologies for calling you out in not mentioning you by name. :huh:
Oy. I don't know how to make this clearer. What I'm saying is I saw her over and over again in the news for however long it's been a story, and her ugliness was not enough of note for me to post about it. It's only because her purported beauty has been raised as an issue that I've responded with dissent (although my initial response was just confusion). I don't see why I deserve censure for voicing an opinion on an issue that's been raised.
Who the hell is being censured? Jesus Christ, man, we disagree, particularly over what I regard as an excessive dissection of her face that makes her out as quite ugly. Fine, I'll add female beauty to the list of topics that I'm not allowed to disagree with or tease you about.
GUYS. STOP.

HOY IS TALKING ABOUT PITY MASTURBATION.
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

Dr. Medulla
User avatar
Atheistic Epileptic
Posts: 116489
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
Location: Straight Banana, Idaho

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Dr. Medulla »

Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote: Ahem.
My apologies for calling you out in not mentioning you by name. :huh:
Oy. I don't know how to make this clearer. What I'm saying is I saw her over and over again in the news for however long it's been a story, and her ugliness was not enough of note for me to post about it. It's only because her purported beauty has been raised as an issue that I've responded with dissent (although my initial response was just confusion). I don't see why I deserve censure for voicing an opinion on an issue that's been raised.
Who the hell is being censured? Jesus Christ, man, we disagree, particularly over what I regard as an excessive dissection of her face that makes her out as quite ugly. Fine, I'll add female beauty to the list of topics that I'm not allowed to disagree with or tease you about.
GUYS. STOP.

HOY IS TALKING ABOUT PITY MASTURBATION.
WHY DO YOU WANT ME TO THINK ABOUT THAT?
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
Posts: 55432
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Wolter »

Dr. Medulla wrote:
Wolter wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote:
eumaas wrote:
Dr. Medulla wrote: My apologies for calling you out in not mentioning you by name. :huh:
Oy. I don't know how to make this clearer. What I'm saying is I saw her over and over again in the news for however long it's been a story, and her ugliness was not enough of note for me to post about it. It's only because her purported beauty has been raised as an issue that I've responded with dissent (although my initial response was just confusion). I don't see why I deserve censure for voicing an opinion on an issue that's been raised.
Who the hell is being censured? Jesus Christ, man, we disagree, particularly over what I regard as an excessive dissection of her face that makes her out as quite ugly. Fine, I'll add female beauty to the list of topics that I'm not allowed to disagree with or tease you about.
GUYS. STOP.

HOY IS TALKING ABOUT PITY MASTURBATION.
WHY DO YOU WANT ME TO THINK ABOUT THAT?
This is big, Hooks. Big.
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

Flex
User avatar
Mechano-Man of the Future
Posts: 35924
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:50pm
Location: The Information Superhighway!

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Flex »

Dr. Medulla wrote:WHY DO YOU WANT ME TO THINK ABOUT THAT?
Me and Wolt shouldn't have to suffer alone.
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a bowl of soup
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a rolling hoop
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle like a ton of lead
Wiggle - you can raise the dead

Pex Lives!

Wolter
User avatar
Half Foghorn Leghorn, Half Albert Brooks
Posts: 55432
Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 7:59pm
Location: ¡HOLIDAY RO-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-OAD!

Re: for the eyes of Matedog only

Post by Wolter »

Ali, on Hoy's PITY MASTURBATION:

"I'm waiting for the woman to send him a Thank You letter."
”INDER LOCK THE THE KISS THREAD IVE REALISED IM A PRZE IDOOT” - Thomas Jefferson

"But the gorilla thinks otherwise!"

Post Reply