Something that I recently learned—in the late 70s, George bought the copyright to "He's So Fine," so he was no longer in violation. I don't know if that's why he bought the song, but that was the effect.JennyB wrote:The Chiffons agree with this post.Marky Dread wrote:My sweet lord is just so Supersonic.
Beatles albums without the other Beatles
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116590
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Beatles albums without the other Beatles
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Beatles albums without the other Beatles
If I sing it I usually blend the two songs.Dr. Medulla wrote:Something that I recently learned—in the late 70s, George bought the copyright to "He's So Fine," so he was no longer in violation. I don't know if that's why he bought the song, but that was the effect.JennyB wrote:The Chiffons agree with this post.Marky Dread wrote:My sweet lord is just so Supersonic.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
- Dr. Medulla
- Atheistic Epileptic
- Posts: 116590
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008, 2:00pm
- Location: Straight Banana, Idaho
Re: Beatles albums without the other Beatles
As in, "He's so fine (hallelujah)"?eumaas wrote:If I sing it I usually blend the two songs.Dr. Medulla wrote:Something that I recently learned—in the late 70s, George bought the copyright to "He's So Fine," so he was no longer in violation. I don't know if that's why he bought the song, but that was the effect.JennyB wrote:The Chiffons agree with this post.Marky Dread wrote:My sweet lord is just so Supersonic.
"Grab some wood, bub.'" - Richard Nixon, Checkers Speech, abandoned early draft
Re: Beatles albums without the other Beatles
he's so fine, my sweet lord etcDr. Medulla wrote:As in, "He's so fine (hallelujah)"?eumaas wrote:If I sing it I usually blend the two songs.Dr. Medulla wrote:Something that I recently learned—in the late 70s, George bought the copyright to "He's So Fine," so he was no longer in violation. I don't know if that's why he bought the song, but that was the effect.JennyB wrote:The Chiffons agree with this post.Marky Dread wrote:My sweet lord is just so Supersonic.
basically go for the most blasphemous combination possible.
I feel that there is a fascistic element, for example, in the Rolling Stones . . .
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
— Morton Feldman
I've studied the phenomenon of neo-provincialism in self-isolating online communities but this place takes the fucking cake.
— Clashy
- Jimmy Jazz
- Graffiti Bandit Pioneer
- Posts: 1552
- Joined: 16 Jun 2008, 6:40pm
Re: Beatles albums without the other Beatles
I believe I read that Paul is playing drums on Dear Prudence as well, which was the only Beatles song where I was ever really impressed with Ringo's drumming. Go figure.Dr. Medulla wrote:Yeah, it was understood that he was the best musician in the band, regardless of instrument (except sitar, I suppose). "The Ballad of John & Yoko," for example, was Paul on drums. Perhaps if he was less talented, or, say, George was more talented, some of the conflicts would have been averted.Heston wrote:Wasn't Paul the best Beatles drummer? He would be, the smug twat.Dr. Medulla wrote:It's easy if you try.Heston wrote:Imagine there's no Ringo.
- Pete Best
(Just finished reading Philip Norman's "Shout!" the other day, so I have Beatles on the mind. An utterly biased pro-John book that takes some unjustified shots at Paul and way too many at George.)